+- CDIH (https://www.cdih.net/cdih)
+-- Forum: General Discussion and Entertainment (https://www.cdih.net/cdih/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: The Pit (https://www.cdih.net/cdih/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Oh man the terrorists are totally ripping Bush off (/showthread.php?tid=12262)
- faceman802 - 11-11-2006
Hoon Wrote:faceman802 Wrote:they've regained power now, do they still want it to fail?Of course. They still need the Presidency.
See, Iraq wasn't a Democrat issue to begin with so it can't be successful in any measure. That would make Bush look too good.
They could win the war between now and the election and the country will probably still vote democrat. That Obamamania is running wild like the hulkster did in the 80's. and the only way bush looks good is if bin laden is caught, and that's most likely only if bush goes to afghanastan and catches his ass himself
- Hoon - 11-11-2006
GonzoStyle Wrote:I personally don't believe there is a better way to fight this other than going hell bent for leather and arming Iraq's entire perimeter. American's don't have the stomach they had in WWII. We are not as tough and gritty as our grandparents, man. Democrats can tap into that softness. That's why they listen to opinion polls. They know americans want a government that does nothing so they can bitch about them not doing anythign rather than a government actually getting something done.Hoon Wrote:My rational is voting Dem's back is bad because they have no firm stance on anything. Their stance is complaining about Bush. That might be the fad.. I mean all the new rock bands with a certain haircut are doing it on Fuse but when it comes to confronting real problems, it's not a solution at all.But cant you agree that while maybe the republican administration had the good intentions of fighting terror, that they werent doing a good job of it. So isnt it only right to try and let the other side give it a go? I mean there is a reason we have these elections every 2 years.
Democrats don't want to succeed in Iraq because they don't want Bush or the Republicans getting credit for it. They want it to be a miserable failure for one reason only... so they can regain power. Please tell me you're not so naive as to not understand that. If not, please tell me the Dmeocrats rock solid position on Iraq - if indeed Iraq was the major election issue.
And there is nothing Al-Queda wants more than another spineless democratic government like they had in the 1990's
If you think the Clinton administration did anything but invite 911 and embolden Al-Queda throughout the 90's, then you're crazy. The Bush administration is fighting the enemy head on and would win. But it takes time, man. Time weak minded americans won't afford because they're used to things being wrapped up in 30 minutes, including commercial breaks.
- GonzoStyle - 11-11-2006
but al queada had nothing to do with iraq....
- HedCold - 11-11-2006
but they're all muslim! duh
- GonzoStyle - 11-11-2006
I bet if you put a bunch of muslims in a 2 bedroom condo and you will get hilarity
- faceman802 - 11-11-2006
GonzoStyle Wrote:but al queada had nothing to do with iraq....
says who?
- GonzoStyle - 11-11-2006
well not the bush administration of course. I wonder if colin powell ever washed his mouth out enough to get the bullshit smell out?
- HedCold - 11-11-2006
a muslim show like friends would be to much comedy for anyone to handle
- GonzoStyle - 11-11-2006
HedCold Wrote:a muslim show like friends would be to much comedy for anyone to handle
and vats the deal viz theez new suicide bombers?!?!?!
APPLAUSE!!!
- faceman802 - 11-11-2006
you stole that from Ladenfeld
- HedCold - 11-11-2006
a muslim seinfeld show
brilliant!
- GonzoStyle - 11-11-2006
HedCold Wrote:a muslim seinfeld show
brilliant!
I actually assumed you wrote seinfeld for some reason, must be cause I steal all his shit.
- GonzoStyle - 11-11-2006
faceman802 Wrote:you stole that from Ladenfield
the powell line or the muslim seinfeld? I forget who I steal what from.
- Hoon - 11-11-2006
GonzoStyle Wrote:but al queada had nothing to do with iraq....Keep telling yourself that. If that's the case why have they made it ground zero in the war with the west and not Afghanistan?
- faceman802 - 11-11-2006
im not explaining, it didn't work out the last time i did
- GonzoStyle - 11-11-2006
Hoon Wrote:GonzoStyle Wrote:but al queada had nothing to do with iraq....Keep telling yourself that. If that's the case why have they made it ground zero in the war with the west and not Afghanistan?
wow, you seriously want me to explain that??!?!?!?!?!!!!!!
- faceman802 - 11-11-2006
It's like fighting with o'reilly and dwight from The Office all wrapped into one
- HedCold - 11-11-2006
bush admitted a few days ago if they pull out of iraq now it screws with their oil plans.
- GonzoStyle - 11-11-2006
I mean Hoon, that was like the worst set up ever. Like the golden rule always is, never ask a question you dont know the answer to, cause the answer may blow up in your face.
You just made yourself look like a complete fuckin maroon.
- Hoon - 11-11-2006
GonzoStyle Wrote:This is boring. You want to deal with going into Iraq in 2003 which has no relevence in what is happening there today.Hoon Wrote:GonzoStyle Wrote:but al queada had nothing to do with iraq....Keep telling yourself that. If that's the case why have they made it ground zero in the war with the west and not Afghanistan?
wow, you seriously want me to explain that??!?!?!?!?!!!!!!
If you want to argue about Iraq in the first place, it was a UN issue.
Your issue is with them and their lack of authority.
If you want to honestly discuss who is there now and who we're fighting, you can't relate the two.