+- CDIH (https://www.cdih.net/cdih)
+-- Forum: General Discussion and Entertainment (https://www.cdih.net/cdih/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Entertainment Unlimited (https://www.cdih.net/cdih/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+--- Thread: Problems in movies or shows - Discuss things that just don't seem righ (/showthread.php?tid=1513)
- Arpikarhu - 04-30-2002
Quote:Yeah Sleeper! And he was on an ether binge at the time too!it was absinthe you tool
- The Sleeper - 04-30-2002
I've read Freud in its original German. I'm gonna move on to Mein Kampf next week.
- Arpikarhu - 04-30-2002
Quote:I've read Freud in its original German. I'm gonna move on to Mein Kampf next weeki bet if i said i had a cold, you would say you had pneumonia
- The Sleeper - 04-30-2002
no, I would say, "haha, you have a cold, sucks to be you"
- Arpikarhu - 04-30-2002
Quote:no, I would say, "haha, you have a cold, sucks to be you"nice comeback.lol
- Skitchr4u - 04-30-2002
Quote:I'm gonna move on to Mein Kampf next week.sleeper don't do it!! i tried in college german class and couldn't do it...i am having enough trouble with the english version right now...so wordy i get tired!
- Maynard - 04-30-2002
Nice absinthe reference.
- The Sleeper - 04-30-2002
Quote:sleeper don't do it!!ok I won't
- Arthur Dent - 05-01-2002
Back to topic:
In Saving Private Ryan: Why didn't they just blow up the bridge right away? Why wait around when you know you can't hold it against a superior force?
-Credit: General Norman Schwartzkoff talking with Tom Hanks.
- crx girl - 05-02-2002
well, this thread seemed rather simple at the beginning, but then you people all went and confused me :clueless:
oh, and i read l'etranger in french too. well, ok, i only read some exerpts, but we also read other books in french, so you see, it's not all that farfetched...
- Maynard - 05-02-2002
Quote:In Saving Private Ryan: Why didn't they just blow up the bridge right away? Why wait around when you know you can't hold it against a superior force?I think that they may have mentioned it in the movie. I don't remember, but I do know from my WWII history, that that was the last bridge crossing that river, and they needed to keep it intact to move allied forces back and forth across the river.
- Arthur Dent - 05-02-2002
Quote:I don't remember, but I do know from my WWII history, that that was the last bridge crossing that river, and they needed to keep it intact to move allied forces back and forth across the river.
The US was already pretty good at creating temporary pontoon bridges for crossing rivers. Losing the "last bridge across the river" would only cause a delay of a few hours while the army corp of engineers put a replacement together. Inconvenient when your in the middle of a major offensive and have momentum on your side, but not major.
Tom Hank's response was "It's just a movie. We needed something to create the dramatic tension for the finale."
- Arpikarhu - 05-02-2002
Quote:It's just a moviemy point all along
- Arthur Dent - 05-02-2002
Quote:It's just a movie
my point all along
Sure, but how entertained are you if you watch the film and are constantly REMINDED it's just a movie by all the things that are wrong with it.
Like "Reindeer Games". Nice concept, good cast, etc. But every time they showed the casino security, I was, like, bullshit. I mean, what moron puts a plywood door on his money room? And plasterboard walls? I don't think so.
Don't know who was the first person to say it, but you should only be asked to accept one thing in a movie that is not realistic. Like the existence of vampires. Establish that there are real vampires and the rules about them. Sunlight, crosses, super strong, etc. Then, eveything else about the movie should be realistic. The effect of guns on objects, the way people act, stuff like that.
In other words, don't treat the audience like their too stupid to notice all the mistakes.