THE UNCENSORED GOOCH INTERVIEW

[Galt]

I couldn't care less if PM's were read or not here on CDIH, not one word or issue either way. (besides, Galt's posts them anyway))

You are aware of the fact that I completely doctored those PMs, right?

You never posted anything about it in the thread, so I wasn't aware if you didn't read it, or actually thought you wrote like the pansy I made you came off as, or didn't care.

I say, in order of likelyhood: 1, 2, 3

[Gooch]

ummm...gonzy...i never mentioned this site or PMs here ever being an issue. Luna thing i have no clue on. my soapbox for paragraph two was disconnected to your statement. sorry if you felt it was directed at you. i was more addressing Laz's penchant to make waves over being informed.

[Gooch]

I couldn't care less if PM's were read or not here on CDIH, not one word or issue either way. (besides, Galt's posts them anyway))

You are aware of the fact that I completely doctored those PMs, right?

You never posted anything about it in the thread, so I wasn't aware if you didn't read it, or actually thought you wrote like the pansy I made you came off as, or didn't care.

I say, in order of likelyhood: 1, 2, 3

1 and 3.

wasn't ever an issue...b/c back when we were actually PMing back and forth, i wondered and half expected it to find it's way on the website. but once i saw it, i didn't bother to read...so never saw it was doctored. that had to be back over the summer b/c i was super-busy then.

[Keyser Soze]

on <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://oauncensored.blogspot.com">http://oauncensored.blogspot.com</a><!-- m -->

Anonymous said...
"WankFellow: and their membership numbers are a complete farce"

That old gag. Opieanthony.net's numbers are similar to those of every other prominent site. I'm sure that there have been many people who have signed up a year ago, forgotten their passwords and, rather than going through the proper channels to retrieve their passwords, have created second accounts. That would account for the slight disparity in numbers. Going by forum activity has no merit, because .net is more than just a forum. I signed up a year or so ago and didn't start posting for a few months. Just because the forum isn't as active as others doesn't mean that the signups aren't legitimate. And besides, .net has no reason to falsify numbers, there are no advertisers to milk.

Foundry has tens of thousands of registered users, is it so difficult to believe that people would follow the link from .com, sign up to read the forums and then go back to their real lives?

11:18 AM

Edited By Keyser Soze on 1104190156

[Black Lazerus]

i don't give a fuck one way or the other . If someone is paying for a board and i am not they can do what the fuck they want to do with it. I never saw when registering for the site, that they said my PM's would be private. grow up fat boy.

see..you are ignorant. only reason it was an issue is that we were told, when asked, by FTL we has his assurances it was....this is b/c of something that went offsite that spilled over. FTL baldfaced lied to a few who had issue...and brought it back. That was issue. You are the moron who doesn't know a shred of anything, yet making a judgement on it. it's amazing how judgements fly based on such little info, you have to wonder that maybe you should judge less, ask more..or just pay it no mind. Then again, if we didn't have judgements flying post counts would drop incredibly.

how is me holding an opinion that it doesn't matter one way or the other to me say that i am ignorant. i think what you are mistaking for being able to read your Pm's is the fact that the mods could see your passwords then log on as you then read your PM's. who's ignorant now bitch.

plus it's a proven fact that you are a paranoid drama queen.

[Gooch]

on <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://oauncensored.blogspot.com">http://oauncensored.blogspot.com</a><!-- m -->

Anonymous said...
"WankFellow: and their membership numbers are a complete farce"

That old gag. Opieanthony.net's numbers are similar to those of every other prominent site. I'm sure that there have been many people who have signed up a year ago, forgotten their passwords and, rather than going through the proper channels to retrieve their passwords, have created second accounts. That would account for the slight disparity in numbers. Going by forum activity has no merit, because .net is more than just a forum. I signed up a year or so ago and didn't start posting for a few months. Just because the forum isn't as active as others doesn't mean that the signups aren't legitimate. And besides, .net has no reason to falsify numbers, there are no advertisers to milk.

Foundry has tens of thousands of registered users, is it so difficult to believe that people would follow the link from .com, sign up to read the forums and then go back to their real lives?

11:18 AM

I saw. poppycock.

[Gooch]

i don't give a fuck one way or the other . If someone is paying for a board and i am not they can do what the fuck they want to do with it. I never saw when registering for the site, that they said my PM's would be private. grow up fat boy.

see..you are ignorant. only reason it was an issue is that we were told, when asked, by FTL we has his assurances it was....this is b/c of something that went offsite that spilled over. FTL baldfaced lied to a few who had issue...and brought it back. That was issue. You are the moron who doesn't know a shred of anything, yet making a judgement on it. it's amazing how judgements fly based on such little info, you have to wonder that maybe you should judge less, ask more..or just pay it no mind. Then again, if we didn't have judgements flying post counts would drop incredibly.

how is me holding an opinion that it doesn't matter one way or the other to me say that i am ignorant. i think what you are mistaking for being able to read your Pm's is the fact that the mods could see your passwords then log on as you then read your PM's. who's ignorant now bitch.

plus it's a proven fact that you are a paranoid drama queen.

i like the obligatory last insult on last line of all your posts. very creative. you do know we are not talking about CDIH.

[crx girl]

mod's can't see your password on cdih

[Gooch]

yeah, but Laz has to login from the back of the site. So who knows.

[Goatweed]

the mods don't even read the mod forum

seriously, we should just make it admins only at this point.

And Gooch, not to burst your bubble but I can assure you that the member numbers on oa.net are not only legitamate, but you can see them yourself - the members list link was put back months ago, because of people like you. When a site has login-only features, people signup - they dont always post. I'm sure you'll believe what you want, but I have 0 reason to vouch for any "poppycock" you might assume is going on.

and no, it is impossible for mods & admins to read anyone's PMs here, other than their own - if anyone doubts that too, whatever - encrypt them all, if it makes you feel better.

[Black Lazerus]

it's not like we are trading top secret govenment info in PM's. unless you are gooch. and i was talking about YMB not this site.

[GonzoStyle]

To defend gooch he never accused CDIH of reading peoples PM's, I just mentioned it jokingly about Luna accusing us when it was some sort of joke with danked in the stoner forum gone wrong and she misunderstood.

My second post was in reply to gooch saying its not a big deal even if we could, I just wanted to say that it is a big deal to me personally.

That was really it, the end as far as my end is concerned.

As far as YMB, have no clue, never heard the story and isnt my place to defend.

[Goatweed]

the stoner forum is kinda dusty...

[GonzoStyle]

yeah "dust"...

[Goatweed]

angel!

[Gooch]

i'll take your word for it, Goaty, in regard to the numbers. they always seemed way too high and way too fast. When OA.com was bustling from show mentions, it never went that fast so quickly, so i just don't get how. But I trust ya.

[Rooner]

I was mentioned up there. Im famous.