04-29-2002, 06:12 AM
I'm awake. I really don't have anything to add to this thread, so here, enjoy some silly propaganda...
Earlier this month was Second mass shooting in Dover Township, NJ in 2 months.
Gun grabbing liberals come out in droves when ever a mass shooting takes place. A typical liberal line goes like this: "Only police officers should have guns. They will protect us."
Well, they are once again silent after a second mass shooting in NJ. Like the first mass shooting in Toms River NJ, the gun grabbing liberals say nothing. Like the first mass shooting in Toms River, NJ, a cop did the killing.
"Only police officers should have guns. They will protect us."
It should be noted that somehow that statement doesn't work; and it should also be noted that the statement is the true spirit of liberalism.
The soccer moms and the limousine liberals have issues with the idea of defense. On one hand they dislike getting their own hands dirty, on the other hand they want others to protect them. Thus they tend to put the police on a pedestal, an elite warrior class with special rights and the ability to be above the law and above having to answer for their actions.
Therefore they can not condemn the police for being harsh. After all that is what the left wants. An enforcement wing for their political beliefs.
You may have also noticed the strange fact that every single cop show on network TV seems to be extremely liberal yet pro-police too. On the surface this seems contradictory, but it becomes crystal clear when you understand the psychology of the liberal. These cop shows glorify policemen who use physical torture on innocents - as long as these innocents belong to the lower classes - in order to ensure obedience and make the streets safe for suburban living soccer moms and their children.
The liberals used to have a slogan: "Working to keep guns out of *the wrong hands*." Gun-banners *always* make exceptions for the extreme political elite, and the extreme financial elite. Why would the liberals have this crypto-fedualist, crypto-fascist double standard?
Any government that fears an armed populace does so only for one reason. It fears a loss of power. When such a government comes in to being, it should be afraid. It should be very afraid. That, and its leaders had better be prepared to answer for their misdeeds.
Any liberal that fears an armed populace does so only for one reason as well. Liberals champion gun control because they lust for a police state where judges and policemen are the only ones allowed to carry weapons, law enforcement agents have privileged class status and unquestioned authority, and contempt of cop is punishable by death. Make no mistake about it, liberals want you be be totally defenseless against abusive policemen. What better way to ensure obedience, and what better way to ensure that those in power and authority are not held up to scrutiny? It all starts on the street.
Any who doubt what I say need only look around them and see the progress liberals have already made in turning this country into a hell hole police state where cops depend on fear and intimidation to get what they want; you must carry picture ID on your person at all times for the convenience of the police, you will be stopped by policemen in the street and they will force to show ID several times for something as simple as going to the supermarket, carrying a legally owned gun on your person will result in police confronting you every fifteen minutes in order to grill you with questions that they have no moral right to know the answers to, refusing to give your full name will result in being taken into custody, and standing up for your rights might get you beaten up or killed.
The immediate, guttural reason for this in the liberal psyche is the liberal's natural cowardice. The liberal sees nothing wrong with entrusting completely and unquestioningly in an authority figure, and also sees nothing wrong with forcing you to do the same. The fact that these authority figures will abuse their power, and innocent citizens, is of no consequence since the lower classes will be taken the brunt of the punishment, and the upper class limousine liberals of Northeastern United States who live in gated communities who make up the majority of the liberal party will not be affected by such police abuse. When the liberal thinks of a world where people live free, with the means to defend themselves against both criminality and tyranny, and the notion that they don't tolerate people who try to tell them what to do, the liberal is both disturbed and baffled. For the liberal thinks in a very structured, narrow viewpoint, and can not grasp anyone thinking differently. The liberal's main defense against a mugger, or similar criminal, is to run around in circles screaming effeminately and helplessly for the police: and the liberal sees no reason why you shouldn't be forced to do the exact same thing. Perhaps it is because liberals are jealous of men who love liberty and do not share the liberals' effeminate bedwetting ways (and thus wish to enslave people to their ways so all will be equal in bondage), or perhaps because liberals simply cannot imagine anyone would want to live differently. They cannot imagine that another person would not react to a mugger in the cowardly way they do, and they cannot imagine why those pesky conservatives are so obstinate when it comes to having no other alternative than to run around in circles screaming in a high pitched voice for someone to save them, and putting themselves totally at the mercy of abusive policemen.
There is also a more deliberate, far more insidious reason. Liberals dream of a New America that is led by nobility, an upper class that has access to weapons and protection while the rest of society are forbidden these same protections. I have had many a liberal anti-gun type tell that they are not really anti gun but rather do not trust the working class to own weapons. Yet these are the same people who see military service as beneath them. The liberals are trying to set themselves up as an elite de-facto aristocracy where they (the proto-lords) get exempted from bans along with the police and military (the proto-knights, but only while on duty protecting the proto-lords).
Earlier this month was Second mass shooting in Dover Township, NJ in 2 months.
Gun grabbing liberals come out in droves when ever a mass shooting takes place. A typical liberal line goes like this: "Only police officers should have guns. They will protect us."
Well, they are once again silent after a second mass shooting in NJ. Like the first mass shooting in Toms River NJ, the gun grabbing liberals say nothing. Like the first mass shooting in Toms River, NJ, a cop did the killing.
"Only police officers should have guns. They will protect us."
It should be noted that somehow that statement doesn't work; and it should also be noted that the statement is the true spirit of liberalism.
The soccer moms and the limousine liberals have issues with the idea of defense. On one hand they dislike getting their own hands dirty, on the other hand they want others to protect them. Thus they tend to put the police on a pedestal, an elite warrior class with special rights and the ability to be above the law and above having to answer for their actions.
Therefore they can not condemn the police for being harsh. After all that is what the left wants. An enforcement wing for their political beliefs.
You may have also noticed the strange fact that every single cop show on network TV seems to be extremely liberal yet pro-police too. On the surface this seems contradictory, but it becomes crystal clear when you understand the psychology of the liberal. These cop shows glorify policemen who use physical torture on innocents - as long as these innocents belong to the lower classes - in order to ensure obedience and make the streets safe for suburban living soccer moms and their children.
The liberals used to have a slogan: "Working to keep guns out of *the wrong hands*." Gun-banners *always* make exceptions for the extreme political elite, and the extreme financial elite. Why would the liberals have this crypto-fedualist, crypto-fascist double standard?
Any government that fears an armed populace does so only for one reason. It fears a loss of power. When such a government comes in to being, it should be afraid. It should be very afraid. That, and its leaders had better be prepared to answer for their misdeeds.
Any liberal that fears an armed populace does so only for one reason as well. Liberals champion gun control because they lust for a police state where judges and policemen are the only ones allowed to carry weapons, law enforcement agents have privileged class status and unquestioned authority, and contempt of cop is punishable by death. Make no mistake about it, liberals want you be be totally defenseless against abusive policemen. What better way to ensure obedience, and what better way to ensure that those in power and authority are not held up to scrutiny? It all starts on the street.
Any who doubt what I say need only look around them and see the progress liberals have already made in turning this country into a hell hole police state where cops depend on fear and intimidation to get what they want; you must carry picture ID on your person at all times for the convenience of the police, you will be stopped by policemen in the street and they will force to show ID several times for something as simple as going to the supermarket, carrying a legally owned gun on your person will result in police confronting you every fifteen minutes in order to grill you with questions that they have no moral right to know the answers to, refusing to give your full name will result in being taken into custody, and standing up for your rights might get you beaten up or killed.
The immediate, guttural reason for this in the liberal psyche is the liberal's natural cowardice. The liberal sees nothing wrong with entrusting completely and unquestioningly in an authority figure, and also sees nothing wrong with forcing you to do the same. The fact that these authority figures will abuse their power, and innocent citizens, is of no consequence since the lower classes will be taken the brunt of the punishment, and the upper class limousine liberals of Northeastern United States who live in gated communities who make up the majority of the liberal party will not be affected by such police abuse. When the liberal thinks of a world where people live free, with the means to defend themselves against both criminality and tyranny, and the notion that they don't tolerate people who try to tell them what to do, the liberal is both disturbed and baffled. For the liberal thinks in a very structured, narrow viewpoint, and can not grasp anyone thinking differently. The liberal's main defense against a mugger, or similar criminal, is to run around in circles screaming effeminately and helplessly for the police: and the liberal sees no reason why you shouldn't be forced to do the exact same thing. Perhaps it is because liberals are jealous of men who love liberty and do not share the liberals' effeminate bedwetting ways (and thus wish to enslave people to their ways so all will be equal in bondage), or perhaps because liberals simply cannot imagine anyone would want to live differently. They cannot imagine that another person would not react to a mugger in the cowardly way they do, and they cannot imagine why those pesky conservatives are so obstinate when it comes to having no other alternative than to run around in circles screaming in a high pitched voice for someone to save them, and putting themselves totally at the mercy of abusive policemen.
There is also a more deliberate, far more insidious reason. Liberals dream of a New America that is led by nobility, an upper class that has access to weapons and protection while the rest of society are forbidden these same protections. I have had many a liberal anti-gun type tell that they are not really anti gun but rather do not trust the working class to own weapons. Yet these are the same people who see military service as beneath them. The liberals are trying to set themselves up as an elite de-facto aristocracy where they (the proto-lords) get exempted from bans along with the police and military (the proto-knights, but only while on duty protecting the proto-lords).