10-14-2002, 08:54 PM
I understand but it is unfair to compare the two. Ruth was decades ahead of his time.
If you take ruth from then, and put him in now. With the way the sport itself has evolved in play, money wise, training wise. I say Ruth would be better than bonds. Ruth was not just the best of his era, no one came close.
If you take ruth from then, and put him in now. With the way the sport itself has evolved in play, money wise, training wise. I say Ruth would be better than bonds. Ruth was not just the best of his era, no one came close.
![[Image: BT-vivalaevolucion-gallery-2756.jpg]](http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i242/gonzostyle/BT-vivalaevolucion-gallery-2756.jpg)
http://www.dvdspot.com/member=Gonzostyle
http://www.myspace.com/brooklyngonzo
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770777388
diceisgod Wrote:I LOVE YOU GONZY WONZY SNOOKIE WOOKIE DUMPLIN BUNS!