06-23-2002, 07:13 PM
i still dislike them both equally
but to be fair, i added up rbis and runs scored, then subtracted home runs, and soriano had 82 [55+44-17] while hillenbrand had 79 [43+49-13]. so i guess for now soriano is greater
robbie alomar still sucks though :disappointed:
but to be fair, i added up rbis and runs scored, then subtracted home runs, and soriano had 82 [55+44-17] while hillenbrand had 79 [43+49-13]. so i guess for now soriano is greater
robbie alomar still sucks though :disappointed: