Is this trade fair?

[diceisgod]

AUSTIN:

SUBJECT: Alright...

First off...everyone, calm the fuck down. You guys are insanely tense. Wow. We all need to sit down and have a beer one of these days, seriously.

Second, I have to agree with xxx and xxx here (yeah, im using names now.)

It's not shady at all, it just doesn't have a shred of sense when at the end of the day Redemption gets a top 10 closer and Slut gets a back log of outfielders and he DOESNT EVEN DROP AN OF AS PART OF THE DEAL. So what makes you think he will actually do anything more with that situation? I'm lead to believe this is a case of horrid mis management, not collusion. So I think it should be vetoed.

PIECE OF SHIT:

SUBJECT: A few things

1. Redemption, you are an ass. You are in 2nd now, but you wont be for long. Trust me, I know, because i was 2nd in Austin's league last year around this time and i struggled to finish 3rd or 4th, i forgot. Theres still a LONG way to go in the year, you douchebag.

2. xxxx, you're right, this trade is much more about mismanagement than collusion. I will take back my collusion statement.

3. Also Irv, yeah it is a bit tense around here, a few beers would be fine. But, your only 13, i cant be responsible for that shit.

AUSTIN

SUBJECT: I just want to know how it's beneficial

When he's still got a horrible middle infield?

ME:

SUBJECT: MISMANAGEMENT!!

Irrelevant. He got a great deal. It's his business what he does with the shitload of outfielders he has. Vetoing this is fucking bullshit.

ME (again)

SUBJECT: LOOK AT THE NUMBERS!!!!

He needs runs, hits, rbi's. I gave him players to address those needs. They are outfielders. So fucking what. Now he can trade ome of his garbage fielders to addres his infield woes. This is why people deal: TO MAKE THEIR TEAM BETTER. You can't impose how people manage their team. That's fucking crap.