2005 AL MVP - Who should it be and why?

[GonzoStyle]

So just to get this straight. you would rather have a bad fielder (Giambi, Juan gonzalez, Sosa, even Manny) get MVP over someone who doesn't play the field?

you are seriously like a broken record, you keep on asking the same question over and over and then harping about it after I answer by asking it again in a different manner. We already discussed the sosa situation a few pages ago.

Bonds is not a great fielder but what he does with his bat far exceeds his fielding, no one comes close to what bonds does offensively, clear cut MVP.

Ortiz is not that much greater than a rod, the he's so clear cut, its not as if I am saying that ortiz has 60 homers and 180 rbis and arod has 35 homers and 100 rbis and he deserves it strictly for playing the field.

I have made this point 20 fuckin times and you come back and consistently harp about it as if a rod is a shitty offensive player and I disqualify ortiz strictly because he's a dh and that fielding is the only important issue. Then make silly comparisons like sosa didnt deserve it cause all he did was hit 66 homers and drive in 160 runs and carry the cubs in 98 but he shouldnt have won cause hes a shitty fielder are you seriously that obtuse? Plus I dont remember giambi, juan or sosa having mvp caliber seasons so why bring them up repeatedly to prove a moot point or make stupid examples like why ozzie didnt win every year for his defense.