02-17-2006, 07:07 PM
OK, so you are basically conceding my points. Great. You realize you bring nothing to the table.
Now, unlike you, I actually need to be armed with information before I'm going to claim it does or does not exist. My initial belief is that it is bullshit, or at most, an insignificant non-issue.
However, before I say one way or the other, I actually need to get some fact base that can back up my claim (which I don't have time to do at work at this time). You see a logical person would respond to me saying "bullshit" by asking "why do you think that?" and then following my response, would say "I challenge that information because of X, Y, and Z. Furthermore, if you look at A, B, and C, you will see a contradictory opinion" rather than "fuck you idiot, you are a republican hack"
But I guess, against you, there is no need for the freeflow of informed opinions.
So let me just say this: the daily political blog I view and cut and paste opinions from says that the scientific proof of global warming is "poopy" and so I agree with them.
Now, unlike you, I actually need to be armed with information before I'm going to claim it does or does not exist. My initial belief is that it is bullshit, or at most, an insignificant non-issue.
However, before I say one way or the other, I actually need to get some fact base that can back up my claim (which I don't have time to do at work at this time). You see a logical person would respond to me saying "bullshit" by asking "why do you think that?" and then following my response, would say "I challenge that information because of X, Y, and Z. Furthermore, if you look at A, B, and C, you will see a contradictory opinion" rather than "fuck you idiot, you are a republican hack"
But I guess, against you, there is no need for the freeflow of informed opinions.
So let me just say this: the daily political blog I view and cut and paste opinions from says that the scientific proof of global warming is "poopy" and so I agree with them.