12-11-2006, 04:55 PM
yes.
The air is clean. The water is clean. Recycling is a) expensive b) more pollutive than making new and c) worthless.
Toxic waste, sure, great be responsible with that. Follow and enforce the laws that already exist.
But my point wasn't about that. The Gore and Kyoto folks want to revolutionize how business is run by putting all of the laws and controls into place under the auspices of stopping the inevitable climate catastrophe. But it's bullshit. Their basis for wanting all these changes isn't valid. It seems just like more anti-capitalism, anti evil big companies, and anti evil rich folk.
This graph makes it seem like there will be no climate catastrophe. It's a cycle. One that has been going on for hundreds of thousands of years, and one that has nothing to do with humans. And no one has been able to explain differently to me.
The air is clean. The water is clean. Recycling is a) expensive b) more pollutive than making new and c) worthless.
Toxic waste, sure, great be responsible with that. Follow and enforce the laws that already exist.
But my point wasn't about that. The Gore and Kyoto folks want to revolutionize how business is run by putting all of the laws and controls into place under the auspices of stopping the inevitable climate catastrophe. But it's bullshit. Their basis for wanting all these changes isn't valid. It seems just like more anti-capitalism, anti evil big companies, and anti evil rich folk.
This graph makes it seem like there will be no climate catastrophe. It's a cycle. One that has been going on for hundreds of thousands of years, and one that has nothing to do with humans. And no one has been able to explain differently to me.