Oh man the terrorists are totally ripping Bush off

faceman802 · 11-11-2006, 04:00 AM

so that means the democrats are terrorists? Stupid they HATE BUSH, and anything that hurts bush THEY ARE HAPPY ABOUT. The election HURT BUSH, SO THEY ARE HAPPY. Bush could trip on a fucking twig twisting his ankle, terrorists will be happy, does that mean twigs are terrorists and support al qaeda?

Hoon · 11-11-2006, 04:17 AM

Yeah, that's the same thing.

Fact is this latest support from Al-Queda to the empowerment of Democrats is just more proof of what folks like myself have been saying for years.
Democrats from Murtha, Drubin, Pelosi to Kennedy have been fighting the administration in conjunction with america's enemies for the past 5 years and it's THOSE actions that have attracted Al-Queda to the Democrat's recent victories.

If that causes you and other leftists to become defensive, that's your problem. You can't have it both ways. You're either fighting for the good of the country or the good of the country's enemies. It's crystal clear which side America's enemies believes you're on.

GonzoStyle · 11-11-2006, 04:19 AM

wow, that last line made me think I was reading a bill oreilly transcript.

faceman802 · 11-11-2006, 04:20 AM

bush choked on a peanut during the super bowl a couple of years ago, are you anti-peanut now?

GonzoStyle · 11-11-2006, 04:22 AM

wasnt it a pretzel?

if it was a peanut, thats even worse.

faceman802 · 11-11-2006, 04:22 AM

im working from memory here, it coulda been a pretzel

GonzoStyle · 11-11-2006, 04:23 AM

whatever, hes a fuckin maroon.

faceman802 · 11-11-2006, 04:25 AM

don't say that, you're supporting the pretzels

Hoon · 11-11-2006, 04:25 AM

Ann COulter could never disgrace the victims of 911 like the voter who pulls the lever for a democrat can.

faceman802 · 11-11-2006, 04:26 AM

I fucking knew I was on Fox News, science damnit I should have worn my good tie

Hoon · 11-11-2006, 04:28 AM

If you were on Fox News you'd probably be standing behind Cindy Sheehan, crying and clapping.

GonzoStyle · 11-11-2006, 04:30 AM

so your rational that voting the dems back in is bad, is because the terrorists say they are supportive of this move cause it shows we have no faith in our government.

so, you're respecting the words of the terrorists and valuing their opinion.

Hoon · 11-11-2006, 04:34 AM

My rational is voting Dem's back is bad because they have no firm stance on anything. Their stance is complaining about Bush. That might be the fad.. I mean all the new rock bands with a certain haircut are doing it on Fuse but when it comes to confronting real problems, it's not a solution at all.

Democrats don't want to succeed in Iraq because they don't want Bush or the Republicans getting credit for it. They want it to be a miserable failure for one reason only... so they can regain power. Please tell me you're not so naive as to not understand that. If not, please tell me the Dmeocrats rock solid position on Iraq - if indeed Iraq was the major election issue.

And there is nothing Al-Queda wants more than another spineless democratic government like they had in the 1990's

faceman802 · 11-11-2006, 04:36 AM

they've regained power now, do they still want it to fail?

GonzoStyle · 11-11-2006, 04:38 AM

Hoon Wrote:My rational is voting Dem's back is bad because they have no firm stance on anything. Their stance is complaining about Bush. That might be the fad.. I mean all the new rock bands with a certain haircut are doing it on Fuse but when it comes to confronting real problems, it's not a solution at all.

Democrats don't want to succeed in Iraq because they don't want Bush or the Republicans getting credit for it. They want it to be a miserable failure for one reason only... so they can regain power. Please tell me you're not so naive as to not understand that. If not, please tell me the Dmeocrats rock solid position on Iraq - if indeed Iraq was the major election issue.

And there is nothing Al-Queda wants more than another spineless democratic government like they had in the 1990's

But cant you agree that while maybe the republican administration had the good intentions of fighting terror, that they werent doing a good job of it. So isnt it only right to try and let the other side give it a go? I mean there is a reason we have these elections every 2 years.

faceman802 · 11-11-2006, 04:40 AM

STAY THE COURSE GONZO

Hoon · 11-11-2006, 04:44 AM

faceman802 Wrote:they've regained power now, do they still want it to fail?

Of course. They still need the Presidency.
See, Iraq wasn't a Democrat issue to begin with so it can't be successful in any measure. That would make Bush look too good.

GonzoStyle · 11-11-2006, 04:45 AM

all you need is to get goat to loan you his tin foil hat and youre complete

HedCold · 11-11-2006, 04:46 AM

i like when people only believe in conspiracies when they think it helps prove their point

Goatweed · 11-11-2006, 04:48 AM

GonzoStyle Wrote:all you need is to get goat to loan you his tin foil hat and youre complete

sorry, I dont lend it out.