07-17-2002, 01:17 PM
I have been thinking about this for a while and wasn't sure whether to post in the tech forum or here.
Advertising is everywhere around us. Billboards, commercials, posters, fliers, and on the internet.
For the most part, advertising only raises our costs in the form of a couple of cent's more on a product to pay to advertise it.
However, on the internet, advertising has a direct cost relation to some consumers in the form of bandwidth usage. Some user's either pay for the amount of bandwidth that they use, thus every time a popup pops up they use more bandwidth. Or some users pay by the hour. Paying by the hour may not seem like it would have a direct cost relation to popup advertising but if the consumer runs into 4 popups in one day, taking 2-3 seconds each time to close them, then within about 1 year they will have had to pay for an extra hour. That doesn't seem like much, but 4 popups in 1 day is moderately low.
There is also the fact that more and more websites are using them, so the users will run into them on a more constant basis than ever before.
To me, forceing the consumer to pay to be advertised a product to is just not right. If the company advertising the product was footing the whole bill, then that would be different.
I do realize that there are programs out there that stop/kill popups, but the popup still uses bandwidth.
What's your take?
Advertising is everywhere around us. Billboards, commercials, posters, fliers, and on the internet.
For the most part, advertising only raises our costs in the form of a couple of cent's more on a product to pay to advertise it.
However, on the internet, advertising has a direct cost relation to some consumers in the form of bandwidth usage. Some user's either pay for the amount of bandwidth that they use, thus every time a popup pops up they use more bandwidth. Or some users pay by the hour. Paying by the hour may not seem like it would have a direct cost relation to popup advertising but if the consumer runs into 4 popups in one day, taking 2-3 seconds each time to close them, then within about 1 year they will have had to pay for an extra hour. That doesn't seem like much, but 4 popups in 1 day is moderately low.
There is also the fact that more and more websites are using them, so the users will run into them on a more constant basis than ever before.
To me, forceing the consumer to pay to be advertised a product to is just not right. If the company advertising the product was footing the whole bill, then that would be different.
I do realize that there are programs out there that stop/kill popups, but the popup still uses bandwidth.
What's your take?