+- YourMomsBox! (https://www.cdih.net/ymb)
+-- Forum: Other Stuff (https://www.cdih.net/ymb/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Lets get Political....and stuff (https://www.cdih.net/ymb/forumdisplay.php?fid=16)
+--- Thread: Why? (/showthread.php?tid=3426)
Why? - Black Lazerus - 06-22-2004
Quote: I guess sending our troops to Iraq under questionable circumstances and then bullshitting the people is more severe than taking illegal campaign donations from China for military secrets.
I think we gave them far more secrets when our EP-3 crashed in china
Why? - madmick - 06-22-2004
You're right those gooks are going to start some shit with us.
They control the Panama Canal, have a huge shipping container port in Bermuda.
Never trust those slanty eyed bastards. Clinton was going to give them the Long Beach California port too.
Fucking commie cocksuckers, DIE!!!!!
Why? - poncho - 06-22-2004
Quote:Originally posted by Roop
If you looked at the on line Clinton AOL poll the majority are anti-Clinton.
Clinton has a WC Fields look about him and I hate Hillary Clinton. It is no wonder he humped that fatty Monica. The things some women drive their husbands to do!
Chelsea looks like she needs to see the farrier for a new set of shoes, you've grown into a mare, fucking horse face!
Oh jeez, I don't mean to sound as though I am part of the vast Right Wing Conspirasy that forced the Clinton's fraud in the Whitewater scandal, the misplaced files, Vince Forster's suicide, the pardon of McDougal, the improper campaign fund raising, the Lewinsky affair, lying under oath to hide the affair...which got him impeached...yes impeached. He was impeached...but I don't want to sound as though I am part of the Republican Attack Machine...the vast right wing conspirousy that only pointed out the truth and the truth was omitted. Thats what the libs do best.
Will You Marry Me?
See Laz... I know how to quote.
Why? - Keyser Soze - 06-22-2004
when clinton lied, nobody died.
Why? - poncho - 06-22-2004
http://www.antiwar.com/hinckle.html
"Clinton droped more Tomahawk and Cruise missles on Iraq than former president George Bush did during the entire Persian Gulf War....without authorization from Congress, to inflict civilian casualties to create a diversion from an obsessed special prosecutor's investigation of his sex life and his lies about it."
Paraphrasing but we all know it's true, did you forget about this? It helps to have all of the major news stations on your side... not too much was said about this whole thing in comparison to the way everyone is attacking Bush lately... or the way they attacked Bush 41...remember the pharmaseutical factory? These news stations tell us all what to think, it's sad that so many follow so blindly, it's one thing to have your own opinion but get all of the facts before you form one.
Why? - Roop - 06-23-2004
Quote:Originally posted by Black Lazerus
even with all of this he is still more respected than bush.... that says a lot about bush.
and btw it's conspiracy you uneducated republican dolt.
Ah yes, I'm not used to spelling that word conspiracy since I rarely use it. I guess liberals know how to spell in their sleep.
But as you can see, Black Lazerus chose not to debate the facts that I laid out and instead chose to make a claim based on his own opinion that Clinton is more respected than Bush...well, how can you substanciate this claim? How can you defend Clinton by not making the attempt to discredit the content of my post but instead pose an attack on something as inane as approval rating? Polls are not credible! If they were, wouldn't we all be asked?
Calling me an uneducated dolt...hmmm, I misspelled a word and you chose to take umbrage with me, forming an opinion that I am uneducated because of something as trivial as a misspelled word. This really is no different than how the democrats and liberals consider President Bush an idiot because he mispronounces words. Apparently in your view, stage presence beats out anything of substance. In that case Clinton is the greatest President of all time.
Why? - SO - 06-23-2004
Quote:But as you can see, Black Lazerus chose not to debate the facts that I laid out
Yeah Laz, you should debate his facts!!!
Quote:Clinton has a WC Fields look about him and I hate Hillary Clinton. It is no wonder he humped that fatty Monica. The things some women drive their husbands to do!
Chelsea looks like she needs to see the farrier for a new set of shoes, you've grown into a mare, fucking horse face!
They speak for themselves, don't they? Who could possibly argue against such a well reasoned, scathing indictment?
Quote:Polls are not credible! If they were, wouldn't we all be asked?
A profoundly ignorant statement; you clearly have no understanding of statistics. A poll of 1,000 people has a margin of error of about 3%. The television and radio industries use random polls as their guide: Neilsen and Arbitron ratings, respectively.
Here's a nice visual aid to illustrate how many different random polls taken on the same subject will yield similar results:
![[Image: pollkatzmainGRAPHICS_8911_image001.gif]](http://www.pollkatz.homestead.com/files/pollkatzmainGRAPHICS_8911_image001.gif)
Why? - Flock of Moosen - 06-23-2004
Such pretty colors! :duh:
Why? - poncho - 06-23-2004
It's called Vietnam syndrome.... somebody, quick... look it up!
Why? - Roop - 06-23-2004
Quote:Originally posted by SO
Polls are not credible! If they were, wouldn't we all be asked?
A profoundly ignorant statement; you clearly have no understanding of statistics. A poll of 1,000 people has a margin of error of about 3%. The television and radio industries use random polls as their guide: Neilsen and Arbitron ratings, respectively.
Here's a nice visual aid to illustrate how many different random polls taken on the same subject will yield similar results:
[/quote]
You are gullible, I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you jack, lets break down this poll shall we, first lets get this straight: Polls are not credible, if they were indeed credible they would not have margins of error. By admitting that they are not scientific and/or can indeed be statistically wrong.
Also, the source of the data plays in most of all. This poll chart you posted was compiled by...A LIBERAL DEMOCRAT. A WEBSITE THAT IS AFFILIATED WITH THE DEMOCRATS! THEREFORE IT IS NOT CREDIBLE!!!
Look at the links the page provided! It's partisan! You can't tell me that the polls are credible because this polkatz site posted it.
And look at the name of the person that compiled it...Stuart Thiel.
Hmm, notice that he is anti Bush?
Don't be so fucking gullible! WAKE UP!
POLLS ARE NOT CREDIBLE!
God Damn you people are ridiculous that you allow yourselves to be lied to not only by the media and you don't know anything about whats going on! You never thought to look at the author or the source of what you consider "fact"? Do I believe everything a conservative says hook, line and sinker? No of course not, but that's because I use my head, I don't believe everything I hear unless I can believe the source. Do you think everything a dem says is gospel? You're nuts!!!
WAKE THE FUCK UP!!!