Posts: 4,170
Threads: 288
Joined: Apr 2003
I just found this over at ESPN.com.
They decided to simulate a series between what are consider two of the worst teams in MLB history, the 1962 Mets and the 2003 Tigers.
Here are the
results.
<center>
</center>
Posts: 189
Threads: 5
Joined: Jul 2003
its so unfair bc like he said ""Our team, we didn't have any farm system. We didn't have 100 years of background. And we didn't have any pitching. The only people we had were people other teams didn't want. ... So I want us to keep the record. At least we have an excuse. If they catch us, everybody in their front office ought to be fired." us mets had nothing in our favor and these tigers just plain stink. you can compare the 2 dammit!
even if the 62s are worse, the tigers will still be the awful tigers.
<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v245/NastyHam/borat1.jpg">
Posts: 4,170
Threads: 288
Joined: Apr 2003
Quote:Originally posted by NastyHam
its so unfair bc like he said \"\"Our team, we didn't have any farm system.
What's unfair? According to that computer simulation the '62 Mets
won.
<center>
</center>
Posts: 2,751
Threads: 205
Joined: Apr 2003
I would actually rather see how this years' Mets would fare against Detroit.
I'm not quite there yet
Believe the Hype, Bitch!!!!