What the fuck?

[Silera]

No one posts in my forum.

:disappointed:

[sweet angel]

I'll post here...I'm stuck in the house for a while.

What shall we talk about?

[60FeetUnderWater]

ok, I'll work on that.

[Ronin]

well, the Forum title is "Silera's Corner". So I thought you were the only one who could post there..

[Silera]

I was just wondering, is the weight of the food you eat directly proportional to the amount of weight you can feasibly gain from it?

I mean if I eat a pound of salad or a pound of meat, would that mean I could gain one pound if I didn't burn any of it?

It seems like no but logically it could be yes.

I need a pound of chocolate cake.

[Sloats]

If you eat a pound of fat, you would only digest 4 oz.


and the reason I don't post here????

[sweet angel]

If you eat a pound of fat, you would only digest 4 oz

Does that mean that the remaining 12 oz are passed or stored?

[Sloats]

view it as lubricant....

[sweet angel]

Ah, okay.

[Black Lazerus]

Originally posted by Silera
I was just wondering, is the weight of the food you eat directly proportional to the amount of weight you can feasibly gain from it?

I mean if I eat a pound of salad or a pound of meat, would that mean I could gain one pound if I didn't burn any of it?

It seems like no but logically it could be yes.

I need a pound of chocolate cake.

1 lbs of meat is not equal to a lbs of salad by calories.
you body breaks all food into the component parts and then converts it to it's needs.

so weighing you food makes no sense because theoretically you could gain 5 lbs from eating a 1.5 lbs cake
thats because fat cells are made up of 85% water.

remember :
fat= 9 calorie's per gram
carbohydrates= 4 calories per gram.

But animal fat is harder to digest than strait carbs