Poll: What would You Rather Be?...
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Total 0 vote(s) 0%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What would You Rather Be?...
#21
Quote:Originally posted by The Brain
Quote:Originally posted by GreasyItalianPrincess
Hawking: can't use my dick. Fuck the space-time continuim
Exactly. If Hawking was really so ingenious, he would've already built himself a cybernetic body.

<img src="http://www.businessworldindia.com/archive/010122/stephen%20hawking.jpg">

He's a hack scientist, I tell you.

Now THAT looks like a man that can give great oral. And it's not like he could even fight me off....................................




Did I just type that out loud?
&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src=http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=wankfellow&gt;&lt;/center&gt;
Reply
#22
I spent the first 6 years of my life mostly deaf, so I'd rather not relive that.

Being blind could hamper my driving skills (though admittedly not by much).

Stephen Hawking... eh, neh.

Since I rarely speak anyway, I'll go with mute.
Reply
#23
I'd have to choose mute because i dont talk much anyway. And when i do, noone cares what i have to say anway, so being a mute wouldnt hurt me too much.
Reply
#24
I'd rather be a hammer than a nail....
Yeah, I'm old.
Well, I'm already half blind, and that sucks enough, so no.
I have "mother" hearing, which I enjoy because I don't miss a thing. Even when I appear to be in a coma, trust me, I hear everything.
Hawking...just not appealing.
So, mute gets my vote. Simply because it would make so many people happy to finally shut me up, and sometimes I seriously need to just not speak.
&lt;img src=&quot;http://members.aol.com/theassetqueen/myhomepage/moss1crop.jpg?mtbrand=AOL_US&quot;&gt;
Reply
#25
FOM said:
Quote:I really didn't want to pick any, but I went with Mute. I'm not much of a talker so that would probably affect me the least of the four choices.
That works nicely for me cause I'd pick deaf. My biggest pet peeves are auditory in nature, and I can always use sign language to communicate to my grunting mute hubby.
&lt;center&gt;[Image: chasflag.jpg]&lt;/center&gt;
Reply
#26
After weighing all the options, I think being mute is definitely the way to go.
&lt;IMG SRC=&quot;http://www.osirusonline.com/reefdwella12ymb.jpg&quot;&gt;

&lt;marquee behavior=alternate scrolldelay=30&gt;The digital pimp, hard at work...&lt;/marquee&gt;
Reply
#27
I'd say deaf, cause you'd still be able to communicate. I think blind is the worst of the three (forgetting Steven Hawkins). But that's only if it were to happen to me now, cause I'd still be able to talk. If I were born deaf, I'd have that weird deaf voice and wouldn't be understandable anyhow.
[Image: 2girls.jpg]
Reply
#28
i dont wanna be any of these .. id rather be a puppy.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)