06-23-2003, 06:20 PM
Done. Re-read with a clear mind and all that other good stuff and will now reply since you clearly need it explained more thoroughly.
Reply:
Its like those images you stare at until you see the 3-d image. When you just glance at it, you see nothing. Just odd, meaningless patterns. When you truly see it, you see the image the artist was trying to convey and interpret from there. If anything, I may have said TOO much for an intro.
Wow. I just reread it again, and it looks like I actually explained the intro within the intro. This is just mind blowing... Am I really that damn good?
Reply:
Its like those images you stare at until you see the 3-d image. When you just glance at it, you see nothing. Just odd, meaningless patterns. When you truly see it, you see the image the artist was trying to convey and interpret from there. If anything, I may have said TOO much for an intro.
Wow. I just reread it again, and it looks like I actually explained the intro within the intro. This is just mind blowing... Am I really that damn good?