07-21-2003, 05:36 AM
Quote:Originally posted by The Brain
The verdict was 8-4 in favor of letting Rose into the Hall. But the jurors also voted him 11-1 of actually betting on baseball. So the general feeling is that despite his actions, he should be eligible.
Nice! Glad to see some people aren't as uptight as Bud Selig.
As for the one person who voted Rose didn't bet on baseball, what rock have they been living under? I never thought this part was even up for debate. We know he did it, whether or not he cares to admit it. My argument is if he didn't bet on his own team to lose, then it shouldn't matter.
<center></center>