08-29-2003, 12:32 PM
Yes, Crackle, it DOES show that the Supreme court favors the Judaic religions over other ones. Again, if it didn't, then why aren't other religions represented? There's no statue of Buddha. I don't see Brahma, Shiva, or Vishnu. Perhaps more realistically, I don't see Buddhist of Hindu laws posted. No Eleven Satanic Rules. No agnostic or atheist pillar questioning the existence of your god.
I really don't buy that you're an atheist, dude. You don't think logically enough. You blindly follow others. So if you're not religious, you might think about picking it up, cause you're already full of shit like they are. If you can't see how representing one religion and NO OTHER is bigotry, then you're fucking blind. Most people arguing this case are blinded by their own religious beliefs... what's your excuse?
You say that the commandments are actual laws already - I would have no problem if they posted those actual laws in place of the commandments, complete with their statute number or whatnot. No problem - because those are laws of this country. But commandments are laws of religion, and that's fucking bullshit.
I really don't buy that you're an atheist, dude. You don't think logically enough. You blindly follow others. So if you're not religious, you might think about picking it up, cause you're already full of shit like they are. If you can't see how representing one religion and NO OTHER is bigotry, then you're fucking blind. Most people arguing this case are blinded by their own religious beliefs... what's your excuse?
You say that the commandments are actual laws already - I would have no problem if they posted those actual laws in place of the commandments, complete with their statute number or whatnot. No problem - because those are laws of this country. But commandments are laws of religion, and that's fucking bullshit.
<center><img src="http://www.yourmomsbox.net/ftl/ftl-oldtimey.gif"></center>