12-23-2003, 07:36 AM
So forgive me for being dense, but what were you saying?
Edit: I do see what you're saying, I think. The analogy still doesn't make sense. The bounty is the answer. $$
I guess the entire point is simple: If the story of the Kurds getting Saddam is true, then:
The Bush admin has a choice to make. They can either:
a)Tell the truth, he was captured by the Kurds who probably hate him more than we do, and handed over to US forces.
b)Lie, we got him ALL BY OURSELVES, look how AWESOME WE ARE!!!
Now, if the Official Administration Version is true, then what would the Kurds have to gain from lying?
Nothing. Really, nothing.
Or is it that goshdurn libural media?
Edit: I do see what you're saying, I think. The analogy still doesn't make sense. The bounty is the answer. $$
I guess the entire point is simple: If the story of the Kurds getting Saddam is true, then:
The Bush admin has a choice to make. They can either:
a)Tell the truth, he was captured by the Kurds who probably hate him more than we do, and handed over to US forces.
b)Lie, we got him ALL BY OURSELVES, look how AWESOME WE ARE!!!
Now, if the Official Administration Version is true, then what would the Kurds have to gain from lying?
Nothing. Really, nothing.
Or is it that goshdurn libural media?