12-24-2003, 02:03 AM
Ad Hominem: "Am I reading your analogy correctly? If I am, you have truly shown your ignorance. "
Ad Hominem: "Or is it that goshdurn libural media?" (far from a redneck or stupid, whatever your insinuation was)
As for your source, let's make a deal. I don't use Fox and NewsMax, you don't use DU and Pacifica.org. Not like they don't have an axe to grind or an agenda to advance right? But you just go right ahead think that you're open-minded and fair-thinking.
"I confirm that Saddam has been arrested," Nazem Dabag, representative in Iran of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), told Reuters.
We were over this, but OK. The Iranian confirms he was arrested. Wow. There's a scoop and a half, huh? Do you think it was possible that we notified the tribal leaders before we notified the press? I think it was probable. Still doesn't say that the Kurds got him, just that he was got.
Next:
The official Iranian news agency IRNA quoted PUK leader Jalal Talabani as saying that Saddam had been captured in his home town of Tikrit.
More Iranians (they wouldn't have an axe to grind either), but OK. Another bearded Walter Winchell announcing to the world that....Saddam had been captured in (Saddam's) home town. Stop the presses on that one, huh?
Maybe it's this ignorance you keep talking about but...I don't see where this fantastic source of yours says that the Kurds caught him, drugged him and left him for the Americans. Maybe it's my reading comprehension, I dunno.
Again, there's nothing CREDIBLE to the story. Not a scintilla of proof. I keep asking and asking but you never seem to provide proof just some guy in Iran stating the obvious about what happened in Iraq. Stick your your guns, rant and rave irrationally that those durn Kurds got him and stamp your feet that this country is evil and lies all the time. Just don't call me ignorant or insinuate that I'm a redneck when you're proven wrong. It's distasteful.
Barring any new earth breaking developments, I think we're all done here, no?
Ad Hominem: "Or is it that goshdurn libural media?" (far from a redneck or stupid, whatever your insinuation was)
As for your source, let's make a deal. I don't use Fox and NewsMax, you don't use DU and Pacifica.org. Not like they don't have an axe to grind or an agenda to advance right? But you just go right ahead think that you're open-minded and fair-thinking.
"I confirm that Saddam has been arrested," Nazem Dabag, representative in Iran of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), told Reuters.
We were over this, but OK. The Iranian confirms he was arrested. Wow. There's a scoop and a half, huh? Do you think it was possible that we notified the tribal leaders before we notified the press? I think it was probable. Still doesn't say that the Kurds got him, just that he was got.
Next:
The official Iranian news agency IRNA quoted PUK leader Jalal Talabani as saying that Saddam had been captured in his home town of Tikrit.
More Iranians (they wouldn't have an axe to grind either), but OK. Another bearded Walter Winchell announcing to the world that....Saddam had been captured in (Saddam's) home town. Stop the presses on that one, huh?
Maybe it's this ignorance you keep talking about but...I don't see where this fantastic source of yours says that the Kurds caught him, drugged him and left him for the Americans. Maybe it's my reading comprehension, I dunno.
Again, there's nothing CREDIBLE to the story. Not a scintilla of proof. I keep asking and asking but you never seem to provide proof just some guy in Iran stating the obvious about what happened in Iraq. Stick your your guns, rant and rave irrationally that those durn Kurds got him and stamp your feet that this country is evil and lies all the time. Just don't call me ignorant or insinuate that I'm a redneck when you're proven wrong. It's distasteful.
Barring any new earth breaking developments, I think we're all done here, no?
![[Image: ymbsig.jpg]](http://members.aol.com/mooncrckt/ymbsig.jpg)