More bush Bullshit.

[SO]

And this will be my last post on the subject as well...

Ad Hominem: \"Am I reading your analogy correctly? If I am, you have truly shown your ignorance. \"

This was in response to your cop-projects analogy, in which it appeared to me that you were saying that Saddam Hussein was somehow allied with the Kurds. Now maybe that wasn't your intention, and if it wasn't, then the label of ignorance does not suit you in this particular case. Just a case of you not being very well spoken.

Ad Hominem: \"Or is it that goshdurn libural media?\" (far from a redneck or stupid, whatever your insinuation was)

How far did you have to reach for that one?

As for your source, let's make a deal. I don't use Fox and NewsMax, you don't use DU and Pacifica.org. Not like they don't have an axe to grind or an agenda to advance right? But you just go right ahead think that you're open-minded and fair-thinking.

I linked (without comment) to a radio interview with the journalist who originally broke the story of Saddam being captured by the Kurds. Did you even listen to it? But hey, I understand, when you don't like the message, shoot the messenger! Oh no, they're saying things I don't agree with! Obviously they have an agenda and are disreputable! My objective and unbiased eyes are burning!

Yes, how dare I link to an interview with the woman who wrote the article that's being discussed over 3 pages. What ever was I thinking?

We were over this, but OK. The Iranian confirms he was arrested. Wow. There's a scoop and a half, huh? Do you think it was possible that we notified the tribal leaders before we notified the press? I think it was probable. Still doesn't say that the Kurds got him, just that he was got.

I'll just note here that nowhere in this thread did I say that it's been <i>proven</i> that the Kurds captured Saddam before handing him over. I think it's probably true, the evidence seems point in that direction, but nowhere did I even imply that this is anything more than informed speculation right now. The only thing that can be proven right now is that he's been captured and is currently in US custody.

Maybe it's this ignorance you keep talking about but...I don't see where this fantastic source of yours says that the Kurds caught him, drugged him and left him for the Americans. Maybe it's my reading comprehension, I dunno.

Reading comprehension is definitely suspect, as is your ability to draw logical conclusions from the information available, it would seem. And again, I will direct you to the interview I linked. It's about an hour long and the reporter who broke the story goes into great detail in explaining how she got the information, and what (allegedly) really happened. If she's lying, she's certainly very good at it.

Again, there's nothing CREDIBLE to the story. Not a scintilla of proof. I keep asking and asking but you never seem to provide proof just some guy in Iran stating the obvious about what happened in Iraq. Stick your your guns, rant and rave irrationally that those durn Kurds got him and stamp your feet that this country is evil and lies all the time. Just don't call me ignorant or insinuate that I'm a redneck when you're proven wrong. It's distasteful.

A) Again, listen to the interview
B) I never volunteered any proof
C) I would never say that this country is evil
D) I never called you ignorant, nor did I insinuate that you're a redneck
E) You have not proven me wrong in any way, in fact nothing whatsoever has been proven here by anyone