03-05-2004, 02:40 PM
Well, yeah, I disagree with that part of the definition as well.
It's simple header, really it is.
Gays should have the same rights as straights, without DEVIATION or modification. They should have the right to marry or become "unified" (use whatever PC term deemed necessary to avoid religious fanatics from jumping off a precipice...not that I would mind if that happened.)
Period.
Bottom line.
Fuck what this or that religion says about it, it has no place in our law books.
PERIOD.
Marriage should be defined as "a union between two persons, under the premise of giving an everlasting commitment to one another."
I can't believe that you don't get it header. Then again, polls have shown that divide is definitely generational. The younger segment firmly supports gays having the right to "unify" while the older segment stands firmly against it.
Are you over the age of 60? Is that it? :tongue:
It's simple header, really it is.
Gays should have the same rights as straights, without DEVIATION or modification. They should have the right to marry or become "unified" (use whatever PC term deemed necessary to avoid religious fanatics from jumping off a precipice...not that I would mind if that happened.)
Period.
Bottom line.
Fuck what this or that religion says about it, it has no place in our law books.
PERIOD.
Marriage should be defined as "a union between two persons, under the premise of giving an everlasting commitment to one another."
I can't believe that you don't get it header. Then again, polls have shown that divide is definitely generational. The younger segment firmly supports gays having the right to "unify" while the older segment stands firmly against it.
Are you over the age of 60? Is that it? :tongue: