No. I just don't agree that we're chucking rights by fighting terrorism.
life was great here after ken and i ran OAS off.
Edited By Arpikarhu on 1110569130
it's so surprising that the 2 people on this board that make 6 figures are libbies
does high 5 figures count?
are you a libbie? if not, did you post that just to say you make high 5 figures?
I thought you voted for kerry, way to sell out the party
Economic Left/Right: 3.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.51
All commies please raise your hand and walk towards the train.
Edited By Mad on 1110569908
Yes Arpi, thanks for alerting me to the existence of the Libertarian party.
The Sleeper Wrote:it's so surprising that the 2 people on this board that make 6 figures are libbies
maybe the fact that we are of libbie mindset allows us to achieve financial success.
Arpi didn't know about it til like 6 months ago or some shit
yes, i voted for kerry. voting for a liberitarian would be a vote for bush. we need to build the party first, otherwise you are just supporting the worse of 2 evils.
Since the majority if not all of libertarians lean right, a vote for a libertarian would have been a vote for kerry.
A vote for Libertarians is a vote for liberty and freedom. Anything else is just a waste of time, IMO.
See Mad sticks to his guns!
its the same with voting for nader. do we really need to have this discussion again? if you prefer libertarian, but you also would prefer kerry over bush and you vote for the libertarian who has no chance at winning, you basically just took away a vote from kerry who needs it in a close race with bush.
I was just pointing out how generalized your claim was. For you, it was taking a vote away from kerry, but not for most libertarians.
if there was a chance for a lib to win, id vote for them.
![[Image: B-libertarian-301.gif]](http://www.buttonhouse.com/Elect-2004/60-Libertarian/B-libertarian-301.gif)