06-15-2005, 02:45 AM
This is weird...
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050613-102755-6408r.htm">http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking ... -6408r.htm</a><!-- m -->
Let's say, like most people like to do, that the tv angle is fact...well, just like it's stupid to think people could sneak explosives into the underground parts of the WTC (like maybe through the subway tunnels when they might've been closed at times for whatever reason), it's stupid to think a handful of terrorists could get away with training to hijack and then succeed in crashing those planes into those buildings.
So the way I see it, if it was an inside job (worst case scenario), our government is evil. If it was terrorists actually being able to sneak and slither their way into succeeding at this, and yet not doing anything more than blowing up roadside bombs or a couple of trains since that point, then our government is stupid (for missing the big one).
So either our govt. is stupid or evil. I like to believe they're a mix of the two, and I fluctuate daily on what levels. Today, I stand at them being 54% evil, 46% stupid.
NOTE: I don't personally believe the Bush admin. or govt. was actively behind 9/11.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050613-102755-6408r.htm">http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking ... -6408r.htm</a><!-- m -->
Quote:A former Bush team member during his first administration is now voicing serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11. Former chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the collapse of the WTC is "bogus" and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7. Reynolds, who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas and is now professor emeritus at Texas A&M University said, "If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling." Reynolds commented from his Texas A&M office, "It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings."
Let's say, like most people like to do, that the tv angle is fact...well, just like it's stupid to think people could sneak explosives into the underground parts of the WTC (like maybe through the subway tunnels when they might've been closed at times for whatever reason), it's stupid to think a handful of terrorists could get away with training to hijack and then succeed in crashing those planes into those buildings.
So the way I see it, if it was an inside job (worst case scenario), our government is evil. If it was terrorists actually being able to sneak and slither their way into succeeding at this, and yet not doing anything more than blowing up roadside bombs or a couple of trains since that point, then our government is stupid (for missing the big one).
So either our govt. is stupid or evil. I like to believe they're a mix of the two, and I fluctuate daily on what levels. Today, I stand at them being 54% evil, 46% stupid.
NOTE: I don't personally believe the Bush admin. or govt. was actively behind 9/11.