Uhhhhhhh,
I don't know if we do these threads anymore,
But I would like to congratulate Jack on having a name in blue.
It is my understanding that he has played a large part in many of the changes and features and look of the board and if that is the case, certainly his name SHOULD be blue.
and Gawd Damn look at him marshal an unruly crowd, firing up the cells, locking topics......
anyway, best of luck in your tenure.
I like Jack. He's a good guy. :-)
He's not all egotistical and stuff.
Thank you Ken. I truly appreciate it.
I liked jack better when he was behind the scenes. Now he just doesn't seem to know how to harness the power of being a mod.
?????? what the fuck is closing that other thread about??? That's very RF-like, Jack. Discussion on something "racy", "debatable", "controversial" should not be closed b/c it may go to some "dangerous" areas. ?????????
shhhhhh leave him alone,
I felt like frankenstein getting chased by the torch wielding villagers,
he did the right thing.
Jack does a great job hear and he was having a hard time remembering what account he was posting with. This should make it easier.
Quote:He's not all egotistical and stuff.
Sorry, I love me.
Quote:Sorry, I love me.
a sure sign you need to diet.......
TOGs and ME till death do us part!!!!!
Quote:a sure sign you need to diet.......
What ever you say, douche bag. When you show you don't go hog wild, talk to me.
Quote:?????? what the fuck is closing that other thread about??? That's very RF-like, Jack. Discussion on something "racy", "debatable", "controversial" should not be closed b/c it may go to some "dangerous" areas. ?????????
Ummm, what exactly was "dangerous", "racy", "debatable", or "controversial" about that thread in the first place? here, I'll sum it up for you, there are no bannings. So, now, whats the point of said thread?
Quote:It was a goof.
Yeah, thats the direction it was going in, sure. Go pick the cotton out of an asprin bottle.
Quote:Sorry, I love me.
What does that have to do with anything? :clueless:
i was just surprised that the thread was closed, and ended with Jack's statement. I didn't think it was getting that ugly, and i wanted to post that banning is pointless when it's a closed membership..it was more apropo when it was a free-for-all like OA in the early days, with morons coming in looking to spam, fight, etc.
Quote:What does that have to do with anything?
When one has to explain a bad joke, one tends to think the joke is not worth rehashing.
I'm struggling with finding any reason why that thread would've been taken seriously. Has anyone ever been banned here? (Am I gonng be the first for continuing this convo?) If they were, was it at the urging of another member?
If I elude to killing someone, it doesn't necessarily mean I'm going to do it, now does it?
Quote:When one has to explain a bad joke, one tends to think the joke is not worth rehashing.
I guess.
What I meant is he doesn't let his little title go to his head and act all arrogant with it.
Is that better?
Edited By LunaBabe on Aug. 22 2002 at 10:05
Quote:I'm struggling with finding any reason why that thread would've been taken seriously. Has anyone ever been banned here? (Am I gonng be the first for continuing this convo?) If they were, was it at the urging of another member?
If I elude to killing someone, it doesn't necessarily mean I'm going to do it, now does it?
Dude, serriously, the thread was just another jab in the ongoing fued of Ken's/OAS. I personally don't give a fuck and you know I don't. Jack didn't want it getting out of hand so he locked it. I am not going to rip him for it.
Quote:I guess.
What I meant is he doesn't let his little title go to his head and act all arrogant with it.
Is that better?
Holy jesus fuck, it is obvious my joke was the one that needed explaining, not yours. I took your comment and said in pretty clear words that I am "egotistical and stuff." as in me, I, Sean.
sean's a god Damn drama queen. haven't you noticed?
yeah, but sean has prettier hair. :-p
Edited By Kid Afrika on Aug. 22 2002 at 10:24