CDIH

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20030729-100001-9301r.htm">http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking ... -9301r.htm</a><!-- m -->

I'm just wondering why a chick would tell someone to stop while she's getting railed. I mean, agreeing to have sex with a guy isn't giving him permission to do whatever he wants, but at least let him bust a nut...blueballs are no fun. If ya suddenly had a moral awakening with a dick in your cunt, I'm sure Jesus will forgive you.

so controversial nobody want's to say anything? or posted after 2am, hmm. the problem is, how do you determine it? kinda grey dontcha think?

and, the article states teenage boy, if either party is teenage under 18, or maybe 17/16 depending where you are, it automatically is unconsensual because minors are technically not able to give consent, if i remember, it's been a while since i took criminology...

I say if she says no, then he should stop - but since she already said yes to begin with, she has to (at least) give him a handy or a hummer. It's not enough that women change their minds minute by minute, but now we can be charged and taken to court for it too?

This is why strapping a ball in her mouth could be very good practice.

stick to mutes