Evaluate my money league team.
12 Team League....
STARTERS
----------
Garcia, Jeff QB SF
Harrison, Marvin WR IND
Holt, Torry WR STL
Dillon, Corey RB CIN
Dunn, Warrick RB ATL
Crumpler, Alge TE ATL
Patriots, D D NE
Longwell, Ryan K GB
BENCH
-------
Brees, Drew QB SD
Booker, Marty WR CHI
Mason, Derrick WR TEN
Brown, Tim WR OAK
Bettis, Jerome RB PIT
White, Jamel RB CLE
Wheatley, Tyrone RB OAK
seems pretty good, but i'd try to trade the a benched receiver or two and/or dunn for a better #2 back, one who is the feature player. also, pick up a free agent tight end for when crumpler has a bye/gets hurt
You've got some real good WR on the bench that you need to trade (or trade Holt who is overvalued since he never scores TDs). Mason and Booker are top 20 receivers. You seriously need to upgrade your RB. Dunn is crap, and Dillon isn't much better (looks like your grab WR first theory didn't quite work out...) Good D. I think the Pats will be real good this year for turnovers/sacks.
Drop White and Wheatley; try and get a good backup QB because Garcia is questionable.
a real mans 14 team league (10th pick): We start QB, WR, WR, RB, RB, RB/WR, TE, K, D
Also a money league
QB: Green, Hasselbeck
RB: Edge, Garner, J Stewart, K Faulk, J Fargas
WR: Holt, R. Smith, J. Reed, K Johnson
TE: Shockey
D: Titans, Redskins
K: Reed (Pitt)
Edited By Galt on 1061792882
Quote:A. Lelie
he is going to be a fucking STUD this year
Actually he's not on my team anymore. I wrote the wrong name.
I just traded him away for Hasselbeck.
any football player named ashley or ashlee or however the fuck you spell it is destined for failure
what about Shannon or Lynn?
I wouldn't worry too much about Garcia.
Quote:Clipped from The Sacramento Bee:
Jeff Garcia not only knocked off the rust in his first preseason start Saturday evening, he looked positively shiny.
In his first game since injuring his lower back in mid-July, Garcia scrambled, improvised and mostly looked like his old self in 1 1/2 quarters of play of the 49ers' 27-12 win over the New Orleans Saints. He took 15 snaps, completing 6 of 7 passes for 52 yards.
As has been said, outstanding WR's but terrible RB's. If you could package Dunn and Holt for a top RB (maybe Edge or Henry?) you should jump on the chance. And dump Wheatley, he's the Raiders' #3 back.
TE could be good, but the Atl offense is a huge question mark now. DEF and K ok, not great but not bad.
by the way, I would take my team over Keyser's and I'm in a 14 team league.
He's got better depth, but I have better starters.
Green < Garcia ADV: Keyser
Edge > Dunn ADV: Galt
Garner < Dillon ADV: Keyser
J Stewart < Harrison ADV: Keyser
Holt = Holt ADV: Tie
Shockey > Crumpler ADV: Galt
Pats < Titans or Skins ADV: Keyser
I think i've got better starters.
shouldn't it be edge > dillon and garner > dunn?
Quote:Edge > Dunn ADV: Galt
Garner < Dillon ADV: Keyser
But...
Edge > Dillon
Garner > Dunn
No?
ok, ill give you that. he has a really strong team for a 14 team league. i still think my team is slightly better as Harrison is head and shoulders better than Edge or Stewart while Dillon is better than Garner. Shockey is a wildcard.
Garner is better than Dillon anyway. Garner will have as many TDs and about 300+ more yards.
Garcia (if healthy) > Green or Hasselbeck. By no means a guaranteee
You've got better WR, I've got MUCH better RB. The difference of Harrison to Rod Smith is not even close to making up for the dropoff from Edge/Garner to Dillon/Dunn
Plus Shockey is way better than Crumpler.
And who cares about Defenses or kickers
Quote:Harrison is head and shoulders better than Edge or Stewart
Stewart yes, but Edge? I really think Edge will break the fuck out this year.
Projection:
Harrison 1650 rec yds, 16 TD's
Edge 1575 rush yds 13 TD's, 500 rec yds 4 TD's
As for Dillon vs. Garner
Dillon 1425/9, 225/1
Garner 875/6, 650/3
I don't think I've seen any sites rank Garner over Dillon actually...
Harrison (405) , Smith (214) ... a 191 pt dropoff
Garner (272), Dillon (240) ... a 32 pt dropoff
Seems fairly obvious. You don't have a MUCH better RB.
Lets go a step further, lets combine your RBs and mine.
Edge(262) and Garner(272) ... 534 total pts
Dillon(240) and Dunn(228) ... 468 total pts
66 pt difference
Lets look at my WRs to yours total pts.
Harrison(405) and Holt(254) ... 659 total pts
Holt(254) and Smith(214) ... 468 total pts
a whopping 191 pt dropoff
it doesnt matter where you get the points from position wise, its that you get them.
still your team is seriously solid for a 14 team league and shouldnt be compared to mine in the first place, its not fair to.
Garner had almost 2000 yards last year and 11 touchdowns
Dillon had over 1600 yards and 7 touchdowns, which is pretty much what he's been doing consistently since he came into the league
In my league's scoring that's 70 more points for Garner
I don't know if anyone has Garner ranked higher, but both were on the board, and I took Garner. He's had 1,800+ total yards 3 of the last four years, while Dillon doesn't get much past 1600. That's 20 points, or 3 touchdowns difference.
Edited By Galt on 1061845999
In what kind of scoring does Harrison get 400 points and Garner gets 270?
Harrison had 1700 yards and 11 touchdowns. Garner had 1900 yards and 11 touchdowns.