![[Image: macy_fargo.jpg]](http://www.dasfilmarchiv.de/macy_fargo.jpg)
(screen.width/2)){this.width = (this.width/2)}" onclick="javascript:if(this.width > (screen.width/2)){this.width = (this.width/2)} else {this.width = (this.width*2)}" border="0" alt='Posted image: Click to resize'>
watch it and find out your limey cunt!
I never said that!!!!
oh wait ok maybe I did?
i tried but it froze your jackass!
take your dull humor to YMB.com
you would know best about dull humor
predictable response. ouch, that hurt me deeply.
you would know best about predictable responses
I never get tired of hearing that
rumsfeld just got owned so hard. they had those quotes right there ready to kick his ass
sleeper wins nothing you half wit. shouldnt you be selling imaginary stocks to your father from your new home in trashville jersey?
neither of those quotes have him saying they were an immediate or imminent threat.
yes they do.
"Some have argued that the nuclear threat from iraq is not imminent, that saddam is at least five to seven years away from having nuclear weapons. I would not be so certain." - Donald Rumsfeld, September 18, 2002
"No terror state poses a greater or more immediate threat to the security of our people and the stability of the world than the regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq" - Donald Rumsfeld, September 18, 2002
I will give you that in his first statement, he allows for some wiggle room of uncertainty, but he is completely commited to Saddam Hussein's regime being an immediate threat in his second statement in terms of context. Not just an immediate threat but the greatest threat in the world.
I thought the second one said " No terror state posses a greater or more Immediate Threat to the security of our people and the stability of the world than the regime of saddam hussein in iraq"