with a fart being A, and an elevator being B, i have determined that:
A + B = funny
where is the infallible proof?
can infallible be used in other instances other than referring to the Pope?
does this mean i'm going to hell for the use?
interesting theorem
but since O&A postulate that A (fart) = funny, does that make B (elevator) = 0, thus introducing the theorem that X (any variable) + B = funny?
don't you mean A + X = funny?
and until i see this infallible proof the use of the word theorem will annoy me
no, if B = 0, then anything (X) + B = funny.
HedCold Wrote:don't you mean A + X = funny?
^^^^^
ok:
A + B = funny
A = funny
thus:
A + X = funny if X = 0
X + B = funny if X = A
wow I need to retake 7th grade math
your conclusion is the same as what you started with
whats the point of making a variable if you're going to give it a set value?
B = 0 is the reason I take the stairs.
0 is the grade of this thread.
Thus, If I fart in this thread, it will be funny
OK, done
I knew we'd all agree in the end.
The Sleeper Wrote:Thus, If I fart in this thread, it will be funny
OK, done
this is where you are wrong. that would not be funny therefore b cannot equal zero.
so O&A are wrong??? but they always win in the end, im confused