who says the media is biased? - Printable Version +- CDIH (https://www.cdih.net/cdih) +-- Forum: General Discussion and Entertainment (https://www.cdih.net/cdih/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: The Pit (https://www.cdih.net/cdih/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Thread: who says the media is biased? (/showthread.php?tid=8828) |
- Arpikarhu - 04-12-2004 Galt Wrote:as soon as I'm wrong, I'll happily own up to it.the day i that i feel the need to include a biblography with my posts just because you are too lazy to look up a refuting argument will be a sad day indeed. the info i gave is accurate and i am not going to open up packed boxes just to satisfy your laziness. - Galt - 04-12-2004 bah, not this argument again. Edited By Galt on 1081798731 - AbeSapien - 04-12-2004 Galt Wrote:That memo says that Bin Laden wanted to attack in the US. He already had ('93), so it's not like it was earth shattering news.The memo itself is classified, so nobody in the general public knows exactly what was on it. It might very well have indications of how, when, and where. One of the points of this panel is to de-classify such documents. Until the memo is declassified, Sleeper cannot say what might be on it, nor can you way what might not be on it. Also, Gonzo stole my sig first. - AbeSapien - 04-12-2004 Arpikarhu Wrote:Until you cite a source, everything you say on this topic is suspect.Galt Wrote:as soon as I'm wrong, I'll happily own up to it.the day i that i feel the need to include a biblography with my posts just because you are too lazy to look up a refuting argument will be a sad day indeed. - Galt - 04-12-2004 the document was unclassified a couple days ago. - HedCold - 04-12-2004 <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0412043package1.html">http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/04 ... kage1.html</a><!-- m --> - AbeSapien - 04-12-2004 Galt Wrote:the document was unclassified a couple days ago.I did not know this. <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://us.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/10/august6.memo/">http://us.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/10/august6.memo/</a><!-- m --> Appearently, there really was nothing of interest concerning 9/11 in it. While they admit to knowing that Al-Quada is working within the united state, they do not allude to anything concerning 9/11. - The Sleeper - 04-12-2004 AbeSapien Wrote:actually it has been declassifiedGalt Wrote:That memo says that Bin Laden wanted to attack in the US. He already had ('93), so it's not like it was earth shattering news.The memo itself is classified, so nobody in the general public knows exactly what was on it. It might very well have indications of how, when, and where. One of the points of this panel is to de-classify such documents. Until the memo is declassified, Sleeper cannot say what might be on it, nor can you way what might not be on it. Quote:Transcript: Bin Laden determined to strike in US - PlasticMan - 04-12-2004 That's the spectacular thing to me. That we had so much investigation going on, even a few of the highjackers were under surveilance from what I remember, and they were still able to pull it off. Clearly no one took it as a credible threat (from Clinton through Bush) or these guys would have been in a dark hole somewhere, not walking the streets. - The Sleeper - 04-12-2004 Yea I don't get the point of having 70 full-fledge FBI investigations if all it results in is transcripts. - Galt - 04-12-2004 so in '98 they said that terrorists wanted to hijack planes. And Bush/Clinton was supposed to do what exactly to stop that? Even AFTER 9/11, reporters and security personell have been able to sneak box cutters and other types of knives through security checkpoints. The document also says that they were looking to target federal buildings, even if they shut every government facility down; the Trade Centers still would have been packed with people. At the time, there were 70 studies in progress. What the fuck was Bush (or Clinton) supposed to do to stop this specifically other than conceding to the terrorists demands that We completely exit the middle east prior to the attacks? - The Sleeper - 04-12-2004 why even have the studies if there is no way of stopping what you are observing? - Galt - 04-12-2004 Keep in mind though, what kind of uproar would have happened if the government took these people down because they were "suspected" terrorists. The ACLU would have been screaming bloody murder. Muslim anti-defamation leagues would have been screaming racism and racial profiling comparing it to FDR and the slopes during WWII. - IrishAlkey - 04-12-2004 People did a lot of skiing in WWII? - Black Lazerus - 04-12-2004 You can't hijack planes if you are in jail/court. - Galt - 04-12-2004 you can't rape white women, deal drugs, rob liquor stores either. Now you know why the police bother black people all the time, and look at the shit they get. Black people are responsible for a lot more than 3,000 deaths a year. - IrishAlkey - 04-12-2004 Deep thoughts. - The Sleeper - 04-12-2004 Galt Wrote:you can't rape white women, deal drugs, rob liquor stores either.so are white people - IrishAlkey - 04-12-2004 How about sharks? - The Sleeper - 04-12-2004 sharks: the Al-Quada of the sea |