07-18-2004, 12:13 AM
1. there is nothing that a documentary cant have an agenda. there are plenty of respected and award winning documentaries that have an agenda.
2. even if only one side is portrayed that in no way means that it isnt the truth.
3. anyone who has watched bush go from claiming his war was about WMD"S, to saying its about a link to al-qaeda, to saying saying sadaam himself was a danger to the u.s,to now saying it is a humanitarian issue, knows what a lying dirtbag he is. maybe it was hard to present the bush side of the issues because they are bereft of merit.
2. even if only one side is portrayed that in no way means that it isnt the truth.
3. anyone who has watched bush go from claiming his war was about WMD"S, to saying its about a link to al-qaeda, to saying saying sadaam himself was a danger to the u.s,to now saying it is a humanitarian issue, knows what a lying dirtbag he is. maybe it was hard to present the bush side of the issues because they are bereft of merit.
I love him. He's like those happy old people who become known for sitting by the side of a busy street and waving to passing cars. People drive by regularly and beep just to see him and get him to wave to them.
That's just like our Arpi... except he doesn't wave or anything. He just says mean things to you.
Nominated for," 2005 poster of the year", by 4 out of 6 mods!
That's just like our Arpi... except he doesn't wave or anything. He just says mean things to you.
GonzoStyle Wrote:I pledge my undying love for Arpi, any retraction of this undying love is to be ignored.
Nominated for," 2005 poster of the year", by 4 out of 6 mods!