01-16-2003, 12:02 AM
Quote:how is our assumption that we are going to war because g.w. has oil interests in mind any worse than the assumption that iraq has weapons of mass destruction.
... The US runs under the assumption that Saddam has weapons of mass destruction because Saddam has not proven otherwise. Because he has not proven himself, he is in violation of the ceasefire, which means we can resume war. ... Like I stated earlier, the fact that President Bush made his money from oil before he was president is not evidence that he is willing to bring the United States into war so that he can get oil contracts... If there was evidence of that, the Democrats would use it and Bush would probably be impeached and forced to leave office at the most, and at the very least he would lose the next election.
Quote:WE have weapons of mass destruction, what makes us any less accountable?
... Our posession of weapons of mass destruction does not breach our ceasefire agreement with Iraq or with any other country.