03-23-2004, 03:13 PM
Number two, you appear to spend many posts & much of your time trying to make others look bad when you prove them wrong. At best, it's hypocritical and ridiculous.
Your first contention on this subject was that I used the wrong term for "sodomite". You can have that. I pointed out to you the additional meaning when the term SODOMITE is used in bibilical references was as a resident, not necessarily sexual in nature.
This is the point where specific and exclusive definitions become your little fetish, for some reason. Nobody said ":exclusively" or "only". The whole thing was simply misinterpretation.
You introduced the concept of biblical references. You introduced it as support for your argument that sodomite was a basic term from the bible which was the proper term for the practice I to which I was referring.
I pointed out that substantiation of that claim by using the bible wasn't pertinent.
It wasn't.
You never said a word about location until I introduced the Sodom of ancient biblical geography as a meaning of the ancient use of the word.
Your first contention on this subject was that I used the wrong term for "sodomite". You can have that. I pointed out to you the additional meaning when the term SODOMITE is used in bibilical references was as a resident, not necessarily sexual in nature.
This is the point where specific and exclusive definitions become your little fetish, for some reason. Nobody said ":exclusively" or "only". The whole thing was simply misinterpretation.
You introduced the concept of biblical references. You introduced it as support for your argument that sodomite was a basic term from the bible which was the proper term for the practice I to which I was referring.
I pointed out that substantiation of that claim by using the bible wasn't pertinent.
It wasn't.
You never said a word about location until I introduced the Sodom of ancient biblical geography as a meaning of the ancient use of the word.