03-23-2005, 10:09 PM
Think for a second why they crossed the line.
I still don't think this a party issue, but a moral issue. I guess most of the pro-lifers are republican and most of the pro-choicers are democrat, but it's not cut and dry like that. But when have facts gotten in the way of you picking your side and demonizing/ignoring the position of the other side?
Those who think she should have the right to die. What's the urgency for them? It's been 15 years. Maybe she'll die today, tomorrow, whatever.
Those who think she should have the right to live. What's the urgency for them? They think a living soul is being murdered. That's what they think. That's why the mobilize the government, fly across the country, whatever. The time is running out, which is why there's so much urgency on the "republican" side.
Certainly you, even in your head-in-the sand method of completely disregarding anything anyone who agrees with you has to see why there's urgency for them.
And maybe if your party could ever nominate a candidate with at least one redeeming quality other than "he's not George Bush", there would be a democrat in the oval office to make these decisions. But you keep stumping for way left wing, unelectable guys like Feingold and it won't be an issue.
I still don't think this a party issue, but a moral issue. I guess most of the pro-lifers are republican and most of the pro-choicers are democrat, but it's not cut and dry like that. But when have facts gotten in the way of you picking your side and demonizing/ignoring the position of the other side?
Those who think she should have the right to die. What's the urgency for them? It's been 15 years. Maybe she'll die today, tomorrow, whatever.
Those who think she should have the right to live. What's the urgency for them? They think a living soul is being murdered. That's what they think. That's why the mobilize the government, fly across the country, whatever. The time is running out, which is why there's so much urgency on the "republican" side.
Certainly you, even in your head-in-the sand method of completely disregarding anything anyone who agrees with you has to see why there's urgency for them.
And maybe if your party could ever nominate a candidate with at least one redeeming quality other than "he's not George Bush", there would be a democrat in the oval office to make these decisions. But you keep stumping for way left wing, unelectable guys like Feingold and it won't be an issue.