10-16-2006, 04:26 PM
that's not even good fodder.
that board is not this board.
this isn't even an argument, it's a debate on board rules.
on that board, there is a rule that excludes members children from ridicule, especially 2 year olds. here, there is not.
here, you have the baker rule.
there, we do not.
how is the making fun of members baby pictures any more or less egregious than posting a regualr members picture or photoshopping it?
that board is not this board.
this isn't even an argument, it's a debate on board rules.
on that board, there is a rule that excludes members children from ridicule, especially 2 year olds. here, there is not.
here, you have the baker rule.
there, we do not.
how is the making fun of members baby pictures any more or less egregious than posting a regualr members picture or photoshopping it?