So, Mad...
|
09-09-2004, 07:06 PM
Can you tell me why we don't need to renew the assault weapons ban?
Let me guess, so we have the same access to Uzis and Mac-10s that the criminals do? ![[Image: 723475742_8cb2b0be6c.jpg]](http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1019/723475742_8cb2b0be6c.jpg)
09-09-2004, 07:08 PM
guns dont kill people, niggers who use guns to rob people & banks kill people.
09-09-2004, 07:09 PM
Niggers dont rob banks, they rob liquor stores, pawn shops, and at best a check cashing place but thats like high collar crimes for them.
![[Image: BT-vivalaevolucion-gallery-2756.jpg]](http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i242/gonzostyle/BT-vivalaevolucion-gallery-2756.jpg) http://www.dvdspot.com/member=Gonzostyle http://www.myspace.com/brooklyngonzo http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770777388 diceisgod Wrote:I LOVE YOU GONZY WONZY SNOOKIE WOOKIE DUMPLIN BUNS!
09-09-2004, 07:11 PM
so i'm guessing it's the other 20 % who are actually in charge of renewing it or not
09-09-2004, 07:11 PM
It's bullshit cosmetic ban, nothing that will ever stop a criminal from getting what they want.
When was the last time you heard of someone being bayoneted to death? At least the high cost of high cap magazines will be dropping. ![[Image: eyes_424.jpg]](http://forums.colddayinhell.net/files/eyes_424.jpg) The spooks come out at night.
09-09-2004, 07:13 PM
how many mags does one needs?
http://www.dvdspot.com/member=Gonzostyle http://www.myspace.com/brooklyngonzo http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770777388 diceisgod Wrote:I LOVE YOU GONZY WONZY SNOOKIE WOOKIE DUMPLIN BUNS!
09-09-2004, 07:14 PM
Keyser Soze Wrote:Surveys show nearly 80 percent of Americans want it renewed.That's nice, however we live in a Constitutional Republic. It's the Bill of Rights, not Bill of Needs. The spooks come out at night.
09-09-2004, 07:20 PM
bush pandering to the NRA voters.
I love him. He's like those happy old people who become known for sitting by the side of a busy street and waving to passing cars. People drive by regularly and beep just to see him and get him to wave to them.
That's just like our Arpi... except he doesn't wave or anything. He just says mean things to you. GonzoStyle Wrote:I pledge my undying love for Arpi, any retraction of this undying love is to be ignored. Nominated for," 2005 poster of the year", by 4 out of 6 mods!
09-09-2004, 07:23 PM
The ban hurts the criminals where it counts, in their pockets. If they can't get it over the counter, its going to be more expensive on the black market. If you can't keep guns out of the hands of criminals, the least you can do is make it more expensive for them to obtain them.
09-09-2004, 07:23 PM
Bush is no friend to the NRA he has repeatedly stated he would sign the AWB if sent to his desk.
The Second Amendment is the final check on government. The spooks come out at night.
09-09-2004, 07:28 PM
Gun bans don't hurt criminals. Look at the UK and Australia's crime stats since enacting a "gun ban".
The spooks come out at night.
09-09-2004, 07:49 PM
the 2nd amendment was written to protect us from the british during the 1700s. its original purpose is no longer applicable and is used completely out of context by moronic gun nuts.
I love him. He's like those happy old people who become known for sitting by the side of a busy street and waving to passing cars. People drive by regularly and beep just to see him and get him to wave to them.
That's just like our Arpi... except he doesn't wave or anything. He just says mean things to you. GonzoStyle Wrote:I pledge my undying love for Arpi, any retraction of this undying love is to be ignored. Nominated for," 2005 poster of the year", by 4 out of 6 mods!
09-09-2004, 07:53 PM
Arpikarhu Wrote:the 2nd amendment was written to protect us from the british during the 1700s. its original purpose is no longer applicable and is used completely out of context by moronic gun nuts.Tell that to me when they put an RFID chip in your hand. The spooks come out at night.
09-09-2004, 07:56 PM
Mad has a point, explain how gun crimes have increased in UK and Australia since gun bans were put in place. I'm willing to see both sides of the debate.
09-09-2004, 08:07 PM
Mad Wrote:that certainly dispels the "nut" portion of my theory.Arpikarhu Wrote:the 2nd amendment was written to protect us from the british during the 1700s. its original purpose is no longer applicable and is used completely out of context by moronic gun nuts.Tell that to me when they put an RFID chip in your hand.
I love him. He's like those happy old people who become known for sitting by the side of a busy street and waving to passing cars. People drive by regularly and beep just to see him and get him to wave to them.
That's just like our Arpi... except he doesn't wave or anything. He just says mean things to you. GonzoStyle Wrote:I pledge my undying love for Arpi, any retraction of this undying love is to be ignored. Nominated for," 2005 poster of the year", by 4 out of 6 mods!
09-09-2004, 08:10 PM
I hate to say it but i am on mads side on this one. Gun bans create one thing a black market of unregistered and untraceable guns. I think the accounting of guns should be better thats all.
![[Image: post-13-72783-laz_vs_the_world.jpg]](http://cdih.net/non-cgi/uploads/post-13-72783-laz_vs_the_world.jpg)
09-09-2004, 08:13 PM
Maybe we should have a five day waiting period for all books or posts after government approval.
The spooks come out at night.
09-09-2004, 08:28 PM
I have never heard of anyone getting shot 25 times with any book.
see thats what i get for taking your side.
|
|
|
