10-16-2006, 04:52 PM
GonzoStyle Wrote:it's pretty much to protect people who want to post pictures of their kids.Hoon Wrote:I assumed it had somehting to do with not posting members pics without permission or some shit. I could be wrong and probably am. I'm not here enough to fully understand vague references. I have to summarize.
Doesn't matter though. I digress on that point.
The crux of the issue is Thing broke the rules.
Don't like the rule? Big deal.
Ultimately it wasn't the rule that got Thing booted.
It was his response to the warnings.
Was the making fun of baby ugly the rule he broke? Is it because it was a baby? Or like if she posted pics of her husband and people were mocking him, would that be ok?
it's really not that difficult to not comment on them.
she had a picture of her two year old baby in her avatr and Thing made some tasteless remarks.
i told him to leave it alone.
he didn't.
dawn kept going crazy over it.
i told her to be quiet, it was being handled.
Thing made a few more jokes in public.
I told him it was basically his last chance.
he told me to go fuck myself, he didn't need that place.
I gave him 30 days.
Now, the same place that sucks and he don't need is the same place he and ken are angry he was banned from.
That board is not this board. There, you can't use racial remarks etc...
That's why we have this place. This is really pretty simple if you ask me.