Posts: 3
Threads: 1
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation:
0
Unfortunate it happened. Agree that it is excessive force with smaller teenager, but would it have happened if he didn't fight back or was belligerent? At what point do you start to hold him accountable?
Posts: 34
Threads: 5
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation:
0
it definitely would not have happened if he didn't TRY TO RUN AWAY FROM THE OFFICER! Kid hasnt taken any responsibility for his actions, and he will continue to not take responsibility because they are throwing out his 20 f'ing charges IN THE LAST 2 YEARS because of this public outcry...BS
Posts: 14
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation:
0
that wouldn't have happened to him if he wasn't resisting.the officer probably did use a little too much force but chances are the kid deserved it.
Posts: 12
Threads: 2
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation:
0
you dont get Effed up when your and not breaking the law!!!!!
Posts: 28
Threads: 1
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation:
0
The cop was alone and the kid tried to break away. There's no telling what he was trying to do. The cop subdued the kid (which was necessary) without using anything near deadly force. I don't have a problem with it.
Posts: 5,721
Threads: 341
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation:
0
No one deserves to be slammed into a wall except pedophiles and rapists. That said, I have no problem with someone resisting being manhandled and I think that was the intent of the cop in this video.
If I was the cop, however, I would have let him go and tazed the ess out of him.
Go fuck yourself. Hard.
Posts: 34
Threads: 5
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation:
0
I think if you try to flee from a police officer that officer can take the means necessary to subdue and control the suspect. Putting someone into the wall is a very good way to take control of a situation. It's not like he took the kids head and smashed it into the wall trying to break teeth out. It was collateral damage the way I see it.