08-06-2008, 07:31 AM
Mad Dog you're all over the road here. The hundreds of thousands of soldiers who died in all the wars previous have nothing to do with Saddam and the Gulf War 2. In the second Gulf War, we've (so far) sacrificed over 4,000 soldiers in order to get Saddam. I don't see that as an equivalent trade off. And I don't align myself with the idea that he would've eventually used WMDs, so therefore he needed to die. He was a prick, I'm glad he and his sons are dead, but it wasn't worth the sacrifice we're still enduring.