09-10-2008, 09:18 AM
I don't believe that Oswald was the only shooter. I don't have time to debate it but here are a couple of reasons why I don't believe it.
1. The head movement as earlier stated. I don't buy it. For every action there is an equal but opposite reaction. Now if a bullet is traveling at 2,200 feet per second and strikes an object that object is going to first be caused to move forward. That's basic physics.
2. Oswald was a marksman. Keyword is "was". How much practice did he have in the interim of his dismissal from the military? That skill requires a lot of practice and honing. Hell, I used to be really good with a set of knunchucks. When I stopped practicing I got sloppy.
3. Jackie going on the trunk to retrieve part of his skull.
4. The wounds vs. the autopsy report.
1. The head movement as earlier stated. I don't buy it. For every action there is an equal but opposite reaction. Now if a bullet is traveling at 2,200 feet per second and strikes an object that object is going to first be caused to move forward. That's basic physics.
2. Oswald was a marksman. Keyword is "was". How much practice did he have in the interim of his dismissal from the military? That skill requires a lot of practice and honing. Hell, I used to be really good with a set of knunchucks. When I stopped practicing I got sloppy.
3. Jackie going on the trunk to retrieve part of his skull.
4. The wounds vs. the autopsy report.
Go fuck yourself. Hard.