10-17-2008, 09:54 AM
Not much honestly. Nobody knew about DNA back then, an if all other evidance proved the convicted guilty, the execution is perfectly alowable. Now if the convicted truely was innocent, and put to death, it would be a tragidy, but unavoidable. Anyways, of those on death row, few if any are innocent. Would you spend millions keeping 10,000 prisoners alive, waiting to be put to death, when one or two MAY be innocent? Where do you draw the line?