Terrorism and Religion Help!!!

[zig]

I'd say that definition implies that the terrorizer (or terrorist, if you prefer) is perpetrating or threating to perpetrate violence. Pointing out the threat, real or perceived, is not the same thing. In fact, one could argue that it's helpful.

I deplore fear tactics and religious indoctrination as much as anyone, but I think this is a correct distinction to make. It's a bad thing to do, but it doesn't really fit the definition of terrorism.
Although if you call it "In Home Terrorism" like you have been doing, then that's a new term and can be distinct from the other definition of terrorism, so I'd say it's applicable.