06-26-2008, 04:10 PM
ahole Wrote:Actually, it says 'unreasonable', and we're only wiretapping calls that originate from or go to suspected terrorists. We obtain warrants ahead of time when possible, or retroactively when timeliness is an issue. The people we're after aren't dummies - they use trac phones and switch cell phones/numbers frequently. We've done this for years going after the Mafia, but now that we're using it to keep tabs on terrorists the left finds it objectionable.dasbow Wrote:Tell you what - find me a copy of the Constitution that even contains the word 'privacy' and I'll tear mine up.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?a..._id=290186
No need my man. I'm with you! I'm so sick of these liberals saying that just because the 4th Amendment protects them from unwarranted search or seisure, that Supreme Ruler Bush shouldn't be allowed to listen in on their phone calls. The only people that should be worried about anyone listening to their calls are gay-talkers and terrorists. Am I right or am I right?! Terror Alert back to Green! Woot Woot!