Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Who will be President?
#64
dasbow Wrote:
ahole Wrote:No need my man. I'm with you! I'm so sick of these liberals saying that just because the 4th Amendment protects them from unwarranted search or seisure, that Supreme Ruler Bush shouldn't be allowed to listen in on their phone calls. The only people that should be worried about anyone listening to their calls are gay-talkers and terrorists. Am I right or am I right?! Terror Alert back to Green! Woot Woot!
Actually, it says 'unreasonable', and we're only wiretapping calls that originate from or go to suspected terrorists. We obtain warrants ahead of time when possible, or retroactively when timeliness is an issue. The people we're after aren't dummies - they use trac phones and switch cell phones/numbers frequently. We've done this for years going after the Mafia, but now that we're using it to keep tabs on terrorists the left finds it objectionable.

Now I'm super excited because I must be talking to someone pretty high up in the Bush Administration. "We're only wiretapping calls that..." WE'RE?! Please tell me this is Karl Rove! I'm so excited right now I could sh-t!

Thanks for bringing the Mafia argument into this too, because we never had to get warrants to tap their phones. I totally hear you about the Left messing things up too. It's probably because they all have gay crushes on terrorists. Instead of making Bush appoint more right wing judges, we should just get rid of the Supreme Court and allow him to interprit the Constitution. That would save us right-wingers a lot of time.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)