06-26-2008, 05:23 PM
Again, read the Patriot Act, then read this:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
The paper proves nothing. Just because Clinton appointees received higher ratings, doesn't mean anything. Bush could have just as easily appointed judges that don't follow ABA guidelines as closely. Either way, even if there is a bias, it doesn't mean they're wrong.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
The paper proves nothing. Just because Clinton appointees received higher ratings, doesn't mean anything. Bush could have just as easily appointed judges that don't follow ABA guidelines as closely. Either way, even if there is a bias, it doesn't mean they're wrong.