Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Eff this, philly mike is an idi0t, ask zdunklee.
Philly Mike Wrote:
zdunklee Wrote:You said that when you changed the numbers in the proof, that is what that is a proof, if you change the numbers you are changing the proof.

I know that if you multipy 9* 0.999 it equals 8.9999... which in turn = 9. But that is NOT what I did in the proof. I didn't ever multiply 9 * 0.9999 ever in the proof.

The 9x = 9 comes from the previous step in which 10x-x - 9.999... - 0.999..., that is what a proof is, it is logical steps that follow from one to the next.

WTF are you talking about???

x = 0.9999...
10x = 9.9999...
10x - x = 9.9999... - 0.9999...
9x = 9
x = 1.

that is exactly what you wrote
you just said yourself that 9*0.999... would be 8.999...

the reason you did the statement was to show how you make it = 1 but if the math is done properly you prove that 0.999... = 0.999... and that's it.

No it doesn't in a proof you have to get the next step from the previous, I am not multiplying 9*0.999... anywhere in the proof, I am subtracting 10x - x.

Subtract the line above that, and tell me what you get.
"What you are about to see is top secret. Do not tell my mother."
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)