Eff this, philly mike is an idi0t, ask zdunklee.

[zdunklee]

yeah, I am kind of surprised i was one of the top of my class when it came to computer programming and all, seeing as i needed to give value to variables and all that, or giving numerical value to arrays, or understanding the best way to work with any number given the fact that sometimes if you truncate a decimal too short it could eff up the whole program and all.

^that right there, is part of the reason mathematicans use a fractional representation of rational numbers, so that doesn't happen.

You would want to jump in on this Jiggy.

Also in hindsite, I believe that this might have all been avoided if I had started from the beginning with axioms and the fact that all math is based on a set of axioms that can never be proved and are taken as being true.

Just to give an example the axioms of Euclidean Geometry are:

1. It is possible to draw a straight line from any point to any other point.

2. It is possible to produce a finite straight line continuously in a straight line.

3. It is possible to describe a circle with any center and any radius.

4. It is true that all right angles are equal to one another.

5. It is true that, if a straight line falling on two straight lines make the interior angles on the same side less than two right angles, the two straight lines, if produced indefinitely, intersect on that side on which are the angles less than the two right angles.


None of the above statements can be proven, but they are what every proof in Euclidean Geometry(known to most simply as geometry, although it is not the only type of geometry) is based off.