05-20-2009, 11:18 AM
Philly Mike Wrote:well here is the bigger part that is fucked up
this is from a news article online
Quote:10 Connects caught up with the 16-year-old in the photo - and her mother Jeanette. The young girl admits she didn't wear underwear that day but says it was because she didn't want her panty lines to show. She says she did not show herself like that on purposeI don't know if they mentioned this on the show or not, but i thought this was kind of retarded. Isn't that what thongs are for?
Yes that's what thongs are for.
Trust me, if she was wearing no panties with a dress, there was a better reason than that. It's called "EASY ACCESS". Someone else was in that dress with her. I'm just sayin'.
"I'm glad to see those 'Worthless Whore' lessons turned out well for you."