A.I.G.

[Philly Mike]

well first of all I don't trust anything that says "at a glance" because it usually poorly conveys the idea of the matter and doesn't really give details about it and is usually worded to take the side of the bias of whatever company or person is presenting it. Shit they don't even usually go into detail when they say "Details" they still try to "simplify" it showing whatever side they want you to see.
now instead of

THE DETAILS: The Obama proposal, if enacted as law by Congress in unchanged form, would:

- Give the federal government power to take over and wind down a large financial company.

- Mandate that large financial institutions raise more capital and meet higher liquidity standards.

it could say

THE DETAILS: The Obama proposal, if enacted as law by Congress in unchanged form, would:

- The government will assist large companies in case of emergencies.

- Encourages large financial institutions to raise capital to bolster the strength of the economy.

Here is another article on the same thing, still a little skewed but it shows a little more of what ideas are really out there.

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/06/17/banks-consumer-protection-business-washington-regulation.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.forbes.com/2009/06/17/banks- ... ation.html</a><!-- m -->

dude, mad dog, i like you and all, but you are starting to seem more like a conspiracy theory guy.